4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
11 / 4
Mentions
including Scott Rothstein?" "Objection." "Did you ever discuss with Mr. Rothstein or anyone on his behalf the value of taking the depositions of Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, former President Clinton, David Copperfield, Leslie Wexner, as an inducement to get Mr. Epstein to settle his lawsuits?" Mr. Sc
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "Mr. Edwards, were you involved in a discussions regarding the deposing of any of the people -- the individuals -- Mr. Trump or any -- with any of the lawyers in your firm, including Scott Rothstein?" "Objection." "Did you ever discuss with Mr. Rothstein or anyone on h
way, Room 10C West Palm Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafele, Presiding Judge This cause came on to be
osing of any of the people -- the individuals -- Mr. Trump or any -- with any of the lawyers in your firm,
did there really is not more than dicta, because when appellate counsel for Epstein attempted to raise -- and he had to -- I mean the Fischer vs. Debrincat case -- THE COURT: Debrincat -- let's call it Fischer, F-I-S-C-H-E-R. MR. BREWER: Fischer had come down, and clearly the court was going to follow
ases being litigated against me by Edwards, including Edwards noticing the depositions of famous dignitaries and celebrities such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who appeared to have no connection whatsoever to any claims of misconduct made by Edwards's clients. Equally consistent wit
ies and celebrities such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who appeared to have no c
ignitaries and celebrities such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who appeared to have
. Edwards v. Epstein, 178 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Epstein filed for review in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court resolved the conflict in Debrincat v. Fischer, No. SCIS-1477, 2017 WL 526508 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2017), holding that the litigation privilege does not bar a malicious prosecution action. B
ases where no air travel was alleged by Edwards's clients, and noticing the depositions of famous dignitaries and celebrities, such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who were not alleged to have had any connection whatsoever to any specific claims of misconduct against the plaintiffs in the
es and celebrities, such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who were not alleged to ha
ignitaries and celebrities, such as Bill Clinton, Donald Trump and David Copperfield, who were not allege
. Edwards v. Epstein, 178 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Epstein filed for review in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court resolved the conflict in Debrincat v. Fischer, No. SC15-1477, 2017 WL 526508 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2017), holding that the litigation privilege does not bar a malicious prosecution action. Ba
MORRIS PHILIP M. BURLINGTON MARC S. NURIK HON. DONALD W. HAFELE, JUDGE TONJA B HADDAD W. CHESTER BREW
se to this Court's order to show cause dated May 3, 2017, the Court has determined that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction in this case. ee Debrincat v. Fischer, 42 Fla. L. Weekly SI41 (Fla. Feb. 9, 2017). The petition for discretionary review is, therefore, denied. No motion for rehearing will b
Entities connected to both Donald Trump and Debrincat

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONDarren Indyke
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON
Naomi Campbell
PERSON
South Florida
LOCATION
David Copperfield
PERSON
Lauderdale
LOCATIONWright
PERSONMarc S. Nurik
PERSON