Epstein Secrets

ition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had

osing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers

at page 283; line 18-20. Q: Mr. Edwards, were you involved in the discussions regarding the deposing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers in your firm including Scott Rothstein? Id. at page 283; line 21-25. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection,

e instruction. Id. at page 286; line 18-19. Q: Isn't it true, Mr. Edwards, that in taking the deposition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had any knowledge of any female having; that is, underage female ever having been on Mr. Epstein's plane and

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

at page 283; line 18-20. Q: Mr. Edwards, were you involved in the discussions regarding the deposing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers in your firm including Scott Rothstein? Id. at page 283; line 21-25. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection,

e instruction. Id. at page 286; line 18-19. Q: Isn't it true, Mr. Edwards, that in taking the deposition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had any knowledge of any female having; that is, underage female ever having been on Mr. Epstein's plane and

ition or in attempting to take the deposition of Donald Trump, you had no information that Mr. Trump had

osing of any of the people of these individuals, Mr. Trump; that is, in discussions with any other lawyers

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

00/hr Edwards to answer questions in preparation of B. Edwards' upcoming deposition KBR Review executed Order Specially Setting Hearing from Judge Donald 0.10 75.00 Hafele 750.00/hr 11/7/2017 TLC Work on Motion to Compel; follow up with T. Haddad re production 9.50 2,137.50 issues; communications

mended Exhibit and Witness Lists AMM Analyze case law in support of our Supplemental Motion for 1.10 434.50 Continuance pursuant to Rule 1.460 of the Florida Rules of Civil 395.00/hr Procedure AMM Conduct research re how do we authenticate website articles and 2.10 829.50 website postings 395.00/hr AMM Prepare me