Epstein Secrets

S DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Oral Argument New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 12:08 p.m. HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge

provision? We're going to present to the jury it's Maxwell who got the benefit of the immunity provision. S

your Honor -- the first line, second sentence. "The allegations made by," and then it says Victoria , which is inaccurate by the drafter, "against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue." And then it follows. But that is the backdrop to this. And she's responding to things about herself, not about anybody else that are

, advocacy statements by Kliman, such as calling Ms. Maxwell a perpetrator, someone he's never met before, bu

y. THE COURT: So problems enough I've got. MR. EDWARDS: I understand. I understand, your Honor. So at a time when Jeffrey Epstein is investigated, Ghislaine Maxwell is flying on his plane, she's vacationing with him. We have flight logs, we have photographs that were taken during that time. THE COURT: So what

est is that today -- and today ends, for our joint effort, at 3:30 -- the defendant's motion with respect to the supplemental reports of Jansen and Kliman; the 302 motion; and there are three that seem to me to go together -- the references to the Florida action, the CVRA action; the Epstein plea agr

20 21 22 23 24 25 his that -- THE COURT: That's a whole different issue. Right? MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. I agree. And finally, your Honor, on this Kliman issue, it seems to me that all of this is -- well, let me back up. Here are the reasons why it's prejudicial, and I don't think we can just say, t

REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00592376 H3ulgiva 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 presentation in front of Kliman that he gets to then comment on. And so really what we're doing is we're trying to clean up the in-court testimony by an out-of-court statement to

vision? We're going to 5 present to the jury it's Maxwell who got the benefit of the 6 immunity provision

onor -- the first line, second sentence. "The 21 allegations made by," and then it says Victoria which 22 is inaccurate by the drafter, "against Ghislaine Maxwell are 23 untrue." And then it follows. But that is the backdrop to 24 this. And she's responding to things about herself, not about 25 anybody el

E COURT: So problems enough I've got. 3 MR. EDWARDS: I understand. I understand, your Honor. 4 So at a time when Jeffrey Epstein is investigated, Ghislaine 5 Maxwell is flying on his plane, she's vacationing with him. We 6 have flight logs, we have photographs that were taken during 7 that time. 8

vocacy 22 statements by Kliman, such as calling Ms. Maxwell a 23 perpetrator, someone he's never met before

hat today -- and today 19 ends, for our joint effort, at 3:30 -- the defendant's motion 20 with respect to the supplemental reports of Jansen and Kliman; 21 the 302 motion; and there are three that seem to me to go 22 together -- the references to the Florida action, the CVRA 23 action; the Epst

8 H3ulgiva 1 his that 2 THE COURT: That's a whole different issue. Right? 3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. I agree. 4 And finally, your Honor, on this Kliman issue, it 5 seems to me that all of this is -- well, let me back up. Here 6 are the reasons why it's prejudicial, and I don't think we can 7 ju

timony there's this staged SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00794381 (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794382 9 H3ulgiva 1 presentation in front of Kliman that he gets to then comment 2 on. And so really what we're doing is we're trying to clean up 3 the in-court testimony by an out-of-court stateme

pe of this case, which is a real 23 issue, obviously. So is it you are restricting your claim to 24 the truth and falsity of the statements about Maxwell? 25 MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, that is the case, your Honor. The SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794557 3 H3V0GIU1 1 stateme

If you notice the date of that 10 article, your Honor, it's March 5th, 2011. 11 The next document I provided is a press statement 12 issued by Ghislaine Maxwell on March 10th, 2011, so five days 13 later, in which she writes, care of her attorneys, "Ghislaine 14 Maxwell denies the various allegations abou

ided is a press statement 12 issued by Ghislaine Maxwell on March 10th, 2011, so five days 13 later, in which she writes, care of her attorneys, "Ghislaine 14 Maxwell denies the various allegations about her that have 15 appeared recently in the media. These allegations are all 16 entirely false."

re statement talks about 24 allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven 25 untrue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT

0 guess, unless you all think it's been covered, the Maxwell 11 motions. What do you think? 12 MR. PAGLIUC

s". 10 Your Honor will notice that this document is not 11 marked confidential, it was produced by Ms. Maxwell over a year 12 ago, it is marked Ghislaine Maxwell 0006, and it's a 13 communication between herself and Alan Dershowitz, someone with 14 whom she does not have a joint defense agreement, and that's 1

4 THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's 15 report? 16 MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming 17 you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a 18 medical doctor. He took a full -- 19 THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you 20 going to withdraw the

ss Complaints". Your Honor will notice that this document is not marked confidential, it was produced by Ms. Maxwell over a year ago, it is marked Ghislaine Maxwell 0006, and it's a communication between herself and Alan Dershowitz, someone with whom she does not have a joint defense agreement, and that's why she pr

20 21 22 23 24 25 H3VOGIU1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Oral Argument x New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 LO310 a.m, Before? HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHILLER

the scope of this case, which is a real issue, obviously. So is it you are restricting your claim to the truth and falsity of the statements about Maxwell? MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, that is the case, your Honor. The SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011305 10 id. 12 13 14

edia coverage. If you notice the date of that article, your Honor, it's March 5th, 2011. The next document I provided is a press statement issued by Ghislaine Maxwell on March 10th, 2011, so five days later, in which she writes, care of her attorneys, "Ghislaine Maxwell denies the various allegations about her th

alks about Virginia Giuffre's allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven untrue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPO

I guess, unless you all think it's been covered, the Maxwell motions. What do you think? MR. PAGLIUCA: Your

reexisting. = THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's report? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a medical doctor. He took a full -- THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you going to withdraw the -- MS. SCHUL

6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Before: x x 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS) Oral Argument New York, N.Y. March 31, 2017 10:10 a.m. HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District J

the scope of this case, which is a real issue, obviously. So is it you are restricting your claim to the truth and falsity of the statements about Maxwell? MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, that is the case, your Honor. The SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00612251 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10

If you notice the date of that 10 article, your Honor, it's March 5th, 2011. 11 The next document I provided is a press statement 12 issued by Ghislaine Maxwell on March 10th, 2011, so five days 13 later, in which she writes, care of her attorneys, "Ghislaine 14 Maxwell denies the various allegations abou

entire statement talks about allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven untrue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPO

I guess, unless you all think it's been covered, the Maxwell motions. What do you think? MR. PAGLIUCA: Your

s Complaints". Your Honor will notice that this document is not marked confidential, it was produced by Ms. Maxwell over a year ago, it is marked Ghislaine Maxwell 0006, and it's a communication between herself and Alan Dershowitz, someone with whom she does not have a joint defense agreement, and that's why she p

2 23 24 25 THE COURT: And why do you have it in your expert's report? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, our expert is -- I'm assuming you're referring to Dr. Kliman, who is a physician. He's a medical doctor. He took a full -- THE COURT: There's a whole thing about it. Are you going to withdraw the -- MS. SCHUL

enies." "Ms. Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicized as news, as they are defamatory." 4 EFTA00792759 "Ghislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavory nature, which have appeared

l was living in New York. Plaintiff is a United States Citizen. Plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of $75,000.00. Defendant's Statement: Ms. Maxwell agrees with the Plaintiff's statement, above. iv. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has asserted which remain to

t the repetition of such old defamatory claims." GM 00068. Plaintiff's Complaint also seeks damages

York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT Pu

in excess of $75,000.00. Defendant's Statement: Ms. Maxwell agrees with the Plaintiff's statement, above. iv

ny Records custodians necessary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores

ch he denies." "Ms. claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicized as news, as they are defamatory." 4 EFTA00617399 "Ghislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavory nature, which have appeared

l was living in New York. Plaintiff is a United States Citizen. Plaintiff is seeking damages in excess of $75,000.00. Defendant's Statement: Ms. Maxwell agrees with the Plaintiff's statement, above. iv. A brief summary by each party of the claims and defenses that party has asserted which remain to

t the repetition of such old defamatory claims." GM 00068. Plaintiff's Complaint also seeks damages

York Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT Pu

in excess of $75,000.00. Defendant's Statement: Ms. Maxwell agrees with the Plaintiff's statement, above. iv

ny Records custodians necessary to authenticate business records under FRE 803(b) 27. Any witnesses necessary for impeachment or rebuttal 28. Dr. Kliman (expert) 29. Dr. Coonan (expert) 30. Jim Jansen (expert) 31. Chris Andersen (expert) 32. Bill Chandler (rebuttal expert) 33. Dianne Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE IN TOTO CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS DESIGNATED BY PLAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE IN TOTO CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS DESIGNATED BY PLAINTIFF FOR

Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 EFTA00595612 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files her Reply in Support of the Motion in Limine to Exclude In Toto certain depositions designated by Plaintiff for use at trial a

203 EFTA00595612 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell") files her Reply in Support of the Motion in Li

w information Plaintiff may present in her case-in-chief. Ms. Maxwell has filed well-founded motions in limine to exclude the testimony of both Dr. Kliman and Professor Coonan prohibiting from providing their credibility and vouching opinions. This is the subject matter of Dr. Esplin's rebuttal report

51 H3ulgiva 1 in 2015, which is, all of these allegations that deal with 2 Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, all of those allegations 3 are untrue, she has the ability to know all of the public 4 information that would tell her this is factually true.

at's fully briefed. 12 THE COURT: Yes. Okay. It's Maxwell's motion. 13 MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. 14

llegations that deal with 2 Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, all of those allegations 3 are untrue,

he Churcher articles, which is 15 referenced by Ms. Maxwell's first public statement about 16 Ms. in 2011.

t, his arrest, neither of which mentioned plaintiff, 8 by the way, but they took those materials and gave them to 9 their psychiatric expert, Dr. Kliman, who made the video we 10 talked about earlier. Dr. Kliman also administered a number of 11 tests to plaintiffs to figure out whether she had any

hysical presence of the other person”); State v. Maxwell, 998 P.2d 680, 685-86 (Or. App. 2000) (affirming

th a message of any sort from you, is that clear? 1 Jane Doe’s 2-8 have filed an affidavit of Dr. Kliman attesting to the psychological harm that they will suffer if Epstein is allowed to intimidate them by attending their deposition. Jane Doe is prep