3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
12 / 3
Mentions
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,
the evaluation" and "disclosures made [Alleged Victim 4]." Id. And fourth, he will testify to "the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA00068504 The Government argues, and the Court agrees, that the first two opinions based on Dr. Hall's
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR
the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA0006
m 4 is relevant to Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It would also cause substantial delay by opening the door to rebuttal evidence by the Government on Alleged Victim 4's mental health, which would likely lead to mini-trials on irrelevant issues. Next, the disclosure states that Dr. Hall will testify to th
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,
the evaluation" and "disclosures made [Alleged Victim 4]." Id. And fourth, he will testify to "the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA00087206 The Government argues, and the Court agrees, that the first two opinions based on Dr. Hall's
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR
the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA0008
m 4 is relevant to Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It would also cause substantial delay by opening the door to rebuttal evidence by the Government on Alleged Victim 4's mental health, which would likely lead to mini-trials on irrelevant issues. Next, the disclosure states that Dr. Hall will testify to th
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC 0: DATE FILED:i 102121 20-CR-330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN,
the evaluation" and "disclosures made [Alleged Victim 4]." Id. And fourth, he will testify to "the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA00089907 The Government argues, and the Court agrees, that the first two opinions based on Dr. Hall's
TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR
the fact that [Alleged Victim 4] did not identify Ms. Maxwell as a perpetrator of any abuse." Id. 4 EFTA0008
m 4 is relevant to Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It would also cause substantial delay by opening the door to rebuttal evidence by the Government on Alleged Victim 4's mental health, which would likely lead to mini-trials on irrelevant issues. Next, the disclosure states that Dr. Hall will testify to th
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and the Government on Alleged

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON
Bradley Cooper
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Russell Simmons
PERSONHaley Robson
PERSON
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
Hernandez
PERSONUSDC SONY
ORGANIZATION
Valle
PERSONLoftus
PERSONDietz
PERSONDaubert
PERSONUlbricht
PERSON