Epstein Secrets

York City NY 10007 Victim / Witness coordinator 3rd October 2022 Dear Wendy Olsen, I am contacting you as a direct victim of Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell that had remained undiscovered and revealed for over a 40 year period, and is connected to Government and Police sources in Australia and the Commo

he business logo design of M.S.I.0 Documented evidence of the Australian Government and Australian Government Departments connected to Epstein and Maxwell who were involved in direct targeting of the targeted victim in 2006-2013 and involved portraying a deep meaningful friendship tactic of gaining tru

ing you as a direct victim of Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell that had remained undiscovered and revea

d commenced reporting, seeking assistance once more. In 2019 I sought Government Assistance with Steven Marshall, Premier of SA and Vickie Chapman, Attomey General of SA and submitted extensive documented evidence to support the submitted report, personally delivered to the offices of both parties. In 2020 I r

e years 2010-2011 - the targeted victim receiving email attachments in the Exact same format containing %20 from both sources, NEIS and Epstein and Maxwell • Documented evidence of Epstein and Maxwell (Adam Gurgly) being directly involved and having knowledge of the targeted victims business developments t

, Wallaroo Mines Kadina SA 5554 I am contacting you in relation to the first two recent contacts regarding being a targeted victim of Epstein and Maxwell and a connected Criminal Network involved and connected to Epstein and Maxwell and is still operational in Australia and endangering my life, involv

age 14 years of age while residing in Kadina and the motive behind the commencement, which involves an Australian Government source as the source, Attomey General of SA Vickie Chapman, and involves a connected Criminal Network involved in the continual 30 year targeting of an individual and involving multiple

id Pearce, Jacqueline Pearce to result in forcing her in to Prostitution ( a disreputable position) for the Sexual Abuse Ring involving Epstein and Maxwell and prominent people to result in the Humiliation and Disrespect of the reputation of the Pearce family in the community of Kadina CYNTHIA PEARCE ;

n to contact in 2020 involving a lawyer ALEXANDRA NGUYEN • • tion of targeted victim by lethal injection involving connected to Govemment source Attomey General of SA Vickie Chapman - DR HOA NGUYEN - involved in falsified diagnosis of a I esulting in the targeted victim being illegally detained and ordered

n, vvanaroo Mmes Kadina SA 5554 I am contacting you in relation to the first two recent contacts regarding being a targeted victim of Epstein and Maxwell and a connected Criminal Network involved and connected to Epstein and Maxwell and is still operational in Australia and endangering my life. I have

le contains documented evidence of the motive and source of the targeting and the reason it began and continued for over a 30 year period involving Attomey General of SA Vickie Chapman. The provided evidence in this file is the final explanation of how and why the targeting began and the motive as to why I inp

n, vvanaroo Mmes Kadina SA 5554 I am contacting you in relation to the first two recent contacts regarding being a targeted victim of Epstein and Maxwell and a connected Criminal Network involved and connected to Epstein and Maxwell and is still operational in Australia and endangering my life. I have

le contains documented evidence of the motive and source of the targeting and the reason it began and continued for over a 30 year period involving Attomey General of SA Vickie Chapman. The provided evidence in this file is the final explanation of how and why the targeting began and the motive as to why I inp

ed arguments that purely intrastate conduct could not be prosecuted under the federal Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 ("CPPA"). First, in Maxwell, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) was not unconstitutional as applied to a defen- dant's intrastate possession of child por- nography, even

ted the provisions of the acts and the orders of the commission. It was claimed that the acts were unconstitutional as being confiscatory. The Attomey General had violated the injunction, was proceeded against for contempt, and was in the custody of the United States marshal. The Supreme Court held the