3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
12 / 3
Mentions
he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:
nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate
she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio
ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif
d France, in case of urgency, the requesting State may seek the provisional arrest of the person sought pending the presentation of the request for extradition6. 8. This procedure can be summarized as follows: Based on a request for provisional arrest, the Prosecutor General may order the arrest of the req
Exhibit B EFTA00074068 IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL ADDENDUM OPINION 1. This Addendum Opinion is provided in response to the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendant's Renewed Motion
ngs in the United States prior to trial and in breach of bail; and (c) on the basis of the information currently known, it is highly unlikelyt that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States in relation to the charges in the superseding indictment dated 7 July 2020. I
seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers
ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL ADDENDUM OPINION 1. This Addendum Opin
of the Opinion. The Secretary of State may only refuse extradition on the grounds provided for in that section, namely: (a) if an applicable bar to extradition6 is found to exist; (b) the Secretary of State is informed that the request has been withdrawn7; (c) there is a competing claim for extradition from
he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:
nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate
she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio
ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif
d France, in case of urgency, the requesting State may seek the provisional arrest of the person sought pending the presentation of the request for extradition6. 8. This procedure can be summarized as follows: Based on a request for provisional arrest, the Prosecutor General may order the arrest of the req
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and extradition6

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
United States
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSONCohen & Gresser LLP
ORGANIZATION
United Kingdom
LOCATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSONMark S. Cohen
PERSON
Christian R. Everdell
PERSON
Ottawa
LOCATION
Lebanon
LOCATION
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Morocco
LOCATION
Estonia
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
INTERPOL
ORGANIZATIONthe International Criminal Court
ORGANIZATION
Tobago
LOCATION