Epstein Secrets

VIEV IS MY WITNESS WHO INCEDIENTLY WAS TRAINED AT CIA HEADQUARTERS AS PER HIS INTERVIEW WITH BRAD EDWARDS IN HIS BOOK CONFIRMING MY ACCOUNT!!!. , GHSILAINE MAXWELL, AND ARE ALL MY WITNESS TOO. I WAS NOT FLYING AROUND THE WORLD COLLECTING LARGE PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES RENDERED, BOASTING TO ANYONE THAT WOULD LI

olling all communication with the outside world, one 15-year- old Swedish girl told how in 2005 she was 'distraught and shaking... literal) iver.as Maxwell and Epstein's assistant confiscated her passport and phone, before pressuring her into having sex. She tried to flee by swimming, but Epstein or

te investigator that was sent numerous times to intimidate, being offered a stack of money in Florida, etc. Didn't fire her attorney after the Ghislaine Maxwell trial because she found out there was a conflict of interest due to him being linked to and Boies? I'm surprised isn't shouting about

nt, I attached the picture again, which was taken in December 2016 whilst David was representing you and me in you're defamation case against Ghislaine maxwell), Bill's presidential rating skyrocketed. So, from a media perspective, good job, Bill. https:/Awww.washingto n.edu/news/2001/01/22 /media-dri

d threats globally, ESPECIA LLY TO THE UN; this must be taken urgently. I would go as far as issuing IMMEDIA TE INTERNA EFTA00145850 TIONAL ARREST WARREN TS for Netanyah u, David Boies, Sigrid, Brad, Stan, Joe and Hunter Biden, Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch. *" Due to the

42P INCO/ANG INCLUDED MINUTES 802 01105 07:43P INCO/ANG INCLUDED MINUTES - Date of InvoIcTI January 15.2005 Page 9 of 12 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY GM 00334597 EF1'A_0020730 I EFTA01310343 cingular nut ess — AT&T Wireless tuber Account Name MARTIN GOLICK Date of Invoice January 15. 2005

0.25 ADO RONAL MINUTES 025 2MIN 0.25 ADO TICNAL MINUTES 0.50 1 MIN 0.25 ADO TICNAL MINUTES 025 1 MN 0.25 ADD TOONAL MNUTES 025 2MIN 0.25 ADD TIONAL /MUTES 0.50 1MN 025 ADD TIONAL MINUTES 025 1 MN 0.25 ADD TONAL MINUTES 025 1 IAN 025 ADD TONAL MINUTES 025 1 MIN 025 ADDITIONAL MINUTES 0.25

ed arguments that purely intrastate conduct could not be prosecuted under the federal Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 ("CPPA"). First, in Maxwell, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) was not unconstitutional as applied to a defen- dant's intrastate possession of child por- nography, even

EPORTER, 2d BEZDIS ACKERMAN, Atty. Goo. I INTERNATION- AL LONOSHOREME 'S t WARE- HOUSEMEN'S UNION of an. it DEVINE., Calmly Atty. of el. INTERNA- TIONAL LONGsHOREME & WARE- HOUSEMEN'S UNION et M. (two oasis). I ACKERMAN, Atty. Gee. at al. INTERNA. TIONAL LONGSHOREMEN &WARE- HOUSEMEN'S UNION it at.