Epstein Secrets

ly thing he might have done wrong was maybe to cross the line a little too closely. Rush advised that Epstein was very upset that Edwards subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell. 9. At no point during this phone call was I told that the discussion was "off the record" or otherwise "confidential". I was never told that ther

n was very upset that Edwards subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell. 9. At no point during this phone call was I to

e counsel a copy of the interview recording. (Id. I 8.) Mr. Rush subsequently corrected the date of the interview to "prior to October 22, 2009." (Rush Supp. Aff., Apr. 30, 2010 [Carroll Reply Decl., May 3, 2010, Ex. C] I 2.) At the outset of the interview, Mr Epstein said that it was off-the-record, a

fied as a co-defendant of Edwards in the Epstein vs. Edwards lawsuit. 3 EFTA00729040 • Epstein said he was very upset that Edwards had subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell, referring to her as a good person that did nothing wrong (i.e., had done nothing wrong even though she helped procure young girls to satisfy Epste

vely use initials, Jane Doe or other anonymous designations . .. [as] a key element of the fraudulent scheme." Complaint 123. 3 Edwards subpoena to Maxwell appears to form one of the grounds for the Epstein vs. Edwards lawsuit. See Epstein Complaint at 141. 4 See Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, No. 9:09-CV-806

ourt conclude that "Epstein made no material admissions regarding the young women suing him for sexual abuse." Daily News Memo. of Law at 6 (citing Rush Supp. Aff. 7 4-5) (emphasis in original). This conclusory assertion is flatly inaccurate, as others who have listened to the recording have explained. On

n Sex Suits. M. POST, Oct. 12, 2009 ("Florida lawyer Brad Edwards. who represents three of the 'Jane Does' who are suing Epstein, told Page Six that Phislaine] Maxwell would be questioned over her knowledge of how Epstein procured many of the girls.") (bold in original); Susan Spencer-Wendel, Judge Agrees

are suing Epstein, told Page Six that Phislaine] Maxwell would be questioned over her knowledge of how Ep

on a digital recording device. Id. During the interview, Epstein made no material admissions regarding the young women suing him for sexual abuse. Rush Supp. Aff. ¶¶ 4-5. So too, because the interview took place months before Epstein filed the Ponzi Scheme Action (and before Rothstein was even publicly