Epstein Secrets

C Protests in a Defense of Warrantless Spying • Bob Menendez's Bribery Case Reminds Us Why Proving Corruption Is So Hard CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS • Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tell Appeals Judges That Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Plea Deal Protects Her • Republicans Subpoenaed 15 Years of Hunter Biden Phone Records, De

argument was repeatedly challenged by one judge on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before the three-judge panel reserved decision. Lawyers for Maxwell are challenging her December 2021 conviction on multiple grounds, but the only topic at oral arguments was whether the deal Epstein struck in Flori

Corruption Is So Hard CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS • Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tell Appeals Judges That Jeffrey

ODAY (3/12, Gomez). Back to Top COUNTERTERRORISM Man Who Sent Bomb Threat to Arizona Election Officials Jailed for 42 Months The Guardian (03/12, Pilkington) reported that James Clark, a 38-year-old Massachusetts man, was sentenced to 42 months in prison for threatening to bomb the Arizona Secretary of S

C Protests in a Defense of Warrantless Spying • Bob Menendez's Bribery Case Reminds Us Why Proving Corruption Is So Hard CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS • Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tells Appeals Judges That Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Plea Deal Protects Her • Republicans Subpoenaed 15 Years of Hunter Biden Phone Records, D

argument was repeatedly challenged by one judge on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before the three-judge panel reserved decision. Lawyers for Maxwell are challenging her December 2021 conviction on multiple grounds, but the only topic at oral arguments was whether the deal Epstein struck in Flori

Corruption Is So Hard CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS • Ghislaine Maxwell's Lawyer Tells Appeals Judges That Jeffre

ODAY (3/12, Gomez). Back to Top COUNTERTERRORISM Man Who Sent Bomb Threat to Arizona Election Officials Jailed for 42 Months The Guardian (03/12, Pilkington) reported that James Clark, a 38-year-old Massachusetts man, was sentenced to 42 months in prison for threatening to bomb the Arizona Secretary of S

ed arguments that purely intrastate conduct could not be prosecuted under the federal Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 ("CPPA"). First, in Maxwell, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) was not unconstitutional as applied to a defen- dant's intrastate possession of child por- nography, even

Browne, L.R. 10 Ch. 64, where I declined to inte ere with criminal proceedings or 1 to follow Lord rdwicke's doubtful decision in Mayor of York Pilkington, 2 Adc. 302. My decision was appea ed from, and the Lords Justices thought it a right decision. With the exception of that case before Lord Hardwi