Epstein Secrets

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00085231 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00090500 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00092761 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00092892 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00103279 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00103349 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00103314 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00103244 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00104658 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC N: DATE FILED: 4/16/21 20-cr-330 (MN) OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Jud

acts in violation of the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell's testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021. Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the

not cover the offenses charged in the SI superseding indictment. 7 EFTA00105669 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 34 C. Maxwell is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing In the alternative to dismissing the indictment, Maxwell requests that the Court conduct an evidentiary h

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELECTR

207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 34 However, it also concludes that even if the statute were ambiguous, it would properly apply to these charges. At Lanfgraf s second step, the Court asks whether application of the statute to past conduct would have impermissible retroactive effects. "[A] statute has pres