Epstein Secrets

of everything, as far as maintenance. Page 11 1 about seven months before -- after I become a full-time 2 employee. 3 Q. Okay. And how did Ms. Maxwell come into the 4 picture? 5 A. It was his girlfriend, his main girlfriend. 6 Q. Okay. Had you known her before she became -- 7 A. No. 8 Q. --

Would you have referred to her as your 13 supervisor or your superior or what would you have 14 called Mrs. Maxwell? 15 A. I used to call her Ghislaine. 16 Q. Okay. And how was it explained to you that 17 you were now to deal with Ms. Maxwell, as opposed to 18 Jeffrey Epstein? 19 A. She would

ng with Mr. Epstein, directly to 17 him. 18 Q. Did that change? 19 A. Later on, yes. 20 Q. And how did that change? 21 A. When Ms. Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell came to 22 the picture. 23 Q. Okay. About when was it that she came into 24 the picture? 25 A. Exactly date, I cannot remember. But it was P

16M, L..1,t‘ 2-S It G- -II 51 B N (30931:. SCN-Ni Vf3,I2 tv. 1..v 5- %, n PB / €'91( Po (2-M i_v I/ k 6 5 11 %, fc.)K .TC:53 t'-0 GM LV ‘.../ i S G., C, ---y2.1.31 it mice:56 1'53 t . IS f'`:. 3:-.- t vril ‘ / 1 9— 5- 2,1 Cs —116ciii c-101Se--2 ('GL 61- 111 IN LV 2. 3

full-time 2 employee. 3 Q. Okay. And how did Ms. Maxwell come into the 4 picture? 5 A. It was his girl

effrey Epstein's 17 Q To your knowledge, has Jeffrey Epstein 18 sex slave. is or was 18 flown to New York while on probation or community 19 Chislaine Maxwell's sex slave? 19 control? 20 MR. YAREMA: Object to the fonn. 20 MR. YAREMA: Object to the form. 21 A Fifth. 21 A Fifth. 22 Q Chislaine Maxwe

Court Reporting Services Prose Court Reporting Services 2 4 Job No.: 1484 Job No.: 1484 2 5 Page 2 Page 4 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.

. Edwards wants to depose individuals who Epstein believes do not have information bearing on the issues as presently framed. Those individuals are Ghislaine Maxwell, Howard Rubenstein, Ava Cordero, and Alan Dershowitz, who Edwards claims have information regarding victim issues, which allegedly took place befor

presently framed. Those individuals are Ghislaine Maxwell, Howard Rubenstein, Ava Cordero, and Alan Dersho

issues as presently framed. Those individuals are Ghislaine Maxwell, Howard Rubenstein, Ava Cordero, and Ala

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-De

stions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROL

uct privilege. Id. at 126-127. Edwards wrongfully claimed the work product privilege for these questions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROLA: Objection, work product. Instruct you not to answer. Id. at 155.6 Q. Who did [Mike Fisten] go to Califo

by this time already put considerable allegations concerning the answer to this question into the records. Obviously, his clients' interaction with Maxwell was not intended to be kept in confidence. 7 EFTA00606632 Q. Who other than Mr. Fisten from an investigator, from an internal investigator at

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT

. Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limit

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA0408003OOC3CMBAG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCO

:24 18:16 11:8 42:22 13:2 14:4,17 Madam (1) matters (1) LatAm (1) level (1) 14:22 15:2,9 61:16 8:19 39:25 52:16 16:9 17:1 maintain (1) Maxwell (3) latch (1) Levin (23) 18:20 19:21 40:10 1:24 62:8,18 40:5 11:10,25,25 21:6,9,10,19 making (3) mean (2) late (2) 12:6,19 13:6 21:22,25

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J.

24 18:16 11:8 42:22 13:2 14:4,17 Madam (1) matters (1) LatAin (1) level (1) 14:22 15:2,9 61:16 8:19 39:25 52:16 16:9 17:1 maintain (1) Maxwell (3) latch (1) Levin (23) 18:20 19:21 40:10 1:24 62:8,18 40:5 11:10,25,25 21:6,9,10,19 malting (3) mean (2) late (2) 12:6,19 13:6 21:22,2

, Esq. FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 7 EFTA00613507 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, -vs- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN,.individually, and BRADL