Epstein Secrets

stions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROL

uct privilege. Id. at 126-127. Edwards wrongfully claimed the work product privilege for these questions as well: Q. What connection, if any, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROLA: Objection, work product. Instruct you not to answer. Id. at 155.6 Q. Who did [Mike Fisten] go to Califo

by this time already put considerable allegations concerning the answer to this question into the records. Obviously, his clients' interaction with Maxwell was not intended to be kept in confidence. 7 EFTA00606632 Q. Who other than Mr. Fisten from an investigator, from an internal investigator at

334011 (561) 802-9044 EFTA00606625 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro.120 I Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M

Courts in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Shepnard v. - 2 - EFTA00616237 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 I Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limi

to give evidence in two separate legal cases involving Jeffrey Epstein, his paedophile friend, The Daily Telegraph has learnt. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell stayed at Sandringham as guests of the puke Photo: ALF3ANPIX/GEOFF PUGH By Jon Swaine (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/joumalists/jon-swaine0 , in Palm B

ne of Prince Andrew's more controversial friends. A decade ago, he was reported to have accompanied her to a "hookers and pimps" party in New York. Ghislaine moved to the US in 1991 after the death of her father and became a fixture on the Manhattan party circuit, where she befriended Jeffrey Epstein. ■

NTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and individually, Defendants. Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PRECLUDE O

ed May 31. 2007. to Financial Trust Company, Inc. Financial Trust Company, Inc. Corporate Directors/Board Members: Jeffrey Epstein, Cecile DeJongh, Ghislaine Maxwell Shareholders: Jeffrey Epstein FTC0001 EFTA00233115 ipciuN4T STAPLE OR FOLD • ma Contratpungrer 33333 I For Official hoe Only Pr

2007. to Financial Trust Company, Inc. Financial Trust Company, Inc. Corporate Directors/Board Members: Jeffrey Epstein, Cecile DeJongh, Ghislaine Maxwell Shareholders: Jeffrey Epstein FTC0001 EFTA00233115 ipciuN4T STAPLE OR FOLD • ma Contratpungrer 33333 I For Official hoe Only Pr OMB No.13

Member Dershowitz Ei er & Adelson, P.C. NM= ew York Co. Telephone: Fax: Email: e mail AY Peer Review Rated Practice Areas: Criminal Appeals; Complex Litigation; Civil Litigation; Post-Conviction Remedies Admitted: 1966, New York Law School: New York University, LL.B., 1966 College: Brooklyn College of th

. Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limit

1 • (561) 802.9044 EFTA00599553 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and

ontrol and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976);

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and

ontrol and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1201 Plaintiff, Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,