Epstein Secrets

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey PagIluca Denver. Colorado www.hmtlaw.com At the initial conference

don, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey PagIluca Denver. Colorado www.hmtlaw.com At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument

ourt Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: Response to the Government's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, t.c Jeffrey FagIluca 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 EH 303.831.736

rado 80203 EH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] At the initial conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "prior investigative files from another investigation in the Southern District of Florida," which it

nment's October 7, 2020 letter, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) Dear Judge Nathan, Had

conference in this case, the Government promised Ms. Maxwell and the Court that it would review and produce "

.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument

VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide additional information in response to the Court's

tates Courthouse Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

United States Courthouse Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Th

here the two entities conducted a small number of joint interviews and engaged in limited sharing of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought wer

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide additional information in response to the Court's

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

gathered any information regarding the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. If so, the Government will request any

here the two entities conducted a small number of joint interviews and engaged in limited sharing of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought wer

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide additional information in response to the Court's

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

gathered any information regarding the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. If so, the Government will request any

here the two entities conducted a small number of joint interviews and engaged in limited sharing of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought wer

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide additional information in response to the Court's

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

gathered any information regarding the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. If so, the Government will request any

here the two entities conducted a small number of joint interviews and engaged in limited sharing of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought wer

ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide additional information in response to the Court's

, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

gathered any information regarding the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. If so, the Government will request any

here the two entities conducted a small number of joint interviews and engaged in limited sharing of information with each other); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") where documents sought wer