Epstein Secrets

ant presented to the Court at the initial bail hearing was undisputedly incomplete, and as the Court noted, the Court lacked "a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances and the resources available to her." Tr. at 86 87. The Defendant has now presented to the Court what is perhaps a more thorough report o

pursuant to a request from Olivier Laude, a partner at the French firm Laude Esquier Champey acting on behalf of Cohen & Gresser LLP as counsel for Ms Ghislaine Maxwell. The request was made in the context of ongoing bail proceedings involving Ms Maxwell in the United States of America (hereafter "USA"), where Ms M

207a0063390eNt Thaatiallat 1 [email protected] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S THIRD MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BAIL Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Of

Court noted, the Court lacked "a clear picture of Ms. Maxwell's finances and the resources available to her."

nationality subsequent to said offense has no bearing upon the removal proceedings and shall not supersede said assessment of nationality. Head of the International Criminal Assistance Bureau Philippi 4E 13, place Vendome - 75042 Paris Cedex 01 - France Telephone: (011) 33.1.44.77.60.60 www.justice.gouv.fr EFTA00093372 Case 21-770,

this basis. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1). 11 EFTA00104531 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 169 Filed 03/22/21 Page 12 of 12 IV. Conclusion Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, Dkt. No. 160, is DENIED. The parties are ORDERED to meet and confer and propose and justify any redactions to the

EW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR

e Court is again confronted with dueling opinions on the correct interpretation of French law. The Government relies on the position of the head of the International Criminal Assistance Bureau of the French Ministry of Justice, who argues that "the fact that the wanted individual is a French national constitutes an insuperable obstacle to

20-cr-00330-AJN Document 169 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY PILED DOC DATE FILED: 3/22/21 20-CR-330 (MN) ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Defenda

EW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY

TRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, —v— Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTR

e Court is again confronted with dueling opinions on the correct interpretation of French law. The Government relies on the position of the head of the International Criminal Assistance Bureau of the French Ministry of Justice, who argues that "the fact that the wanted individual is a French national constitutes an insuperable obstacle to