Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
7 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
4 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00017832
ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant's letter of August 10, 2020 (t
Page: EFTA00017832 →, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern
Page: EFTA00017832 →Page EFTA00017834Same page
tective order expressly precludes. See Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) (Dkt. 1100). Mor
Page: EFTA00017834 →meaningfully evaluated at this stage, prior to the completion of discovery. See United States v. Mahabub, 13 Cr. 908 (AJN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (denying a motion for a bill of particulars that sought, among other things, the "alleged victim and noting that "[a] bill of particulars
Page: EFTA00017834 →4 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA00029966
ited States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in opposition to the defendant's letter of August 10, 2020 (t
Page: EFTA00029966 →, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Chislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern
Page: EFTA00029966 →Page EFTA00029968Same page
tective order expressly precludes. See Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) (Dkt. 1100). Mor
Page: EFTA00029968 →meaningfully evaluated at this stage, prior to the completion of discovery. See United States v. Mahabub, 13 Cr. 908 (AJN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (denying a motion for a bill of particulars that sought, among other things, the "alleged victim and noting that "[a] bill of particulars
Page: EFTA00029968 →2 mentions
Page EFTA00015551
the previous statute was still running, the extension was permissible); United States v. Pierre-Louis, No. 16 Cr. 541 (CM), 2018 WL 4043140, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 9, 2018) (same). Moreover, with respect to the NPA, that agreement, to which the Southern District of New York was not a party, which by its expres
Page: EFTA00015551 →Page EFTA00015557
orro Ranch Corporation, New York Strategy Group, Ghislaine Corporation, J Epstein and Company and the Finan
Page: EFTA00015557 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (11)
Entities connected to both Ghislaine Maxwell and S.D.N.Y. Aug.
Prince Andrew
PERSON2,544 w/ Ghislaine·3 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION917 w/ Ghislaine·3 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON683 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Alison J. Nathan
PERSON536 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION287 w/ Ghislaine·3 w/ S.D.N.Y.
Federal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION180 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
TH
Thompson
PERSON80 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
MA
Mahabub
PERSON19 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
SI
Sindone
PERSON4 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
CA
Cannone
PERSON3 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.
WA
Warme
PERSON3 w/ Ghislaine·2 w/ S.D.N.Y.