Epstein Secrets

nd times, on August 27, 2003, Plaintiff Nelson Shanks provided notices to Defendants' counsel of the oral depositions of Defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Abigail Wexner and Leslie Wexner to be taken on September 9th and 10th, 2003 in the offices of Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing, P.C., in Philadelphia, Pa.

Page 2 of 7 Defendant ABIGAIL WEXNER H/W Defendant JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN INDIVIDUALLY doing business as J. EPSTEIN AND COMPANY, INC. Defendant GHISLAINE MAXWELL ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by CHRISTOPHER J. GUITON (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED J. FOX (See a

above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Date Filed # Docket Text 10/02/2002 1 COMPLAINT against JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ABIGAIL WEXNER, LESLIE WEXNER ( Filing fee $ 150 receipt number 803892.), filed by NELSON SHANICS.(ti, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 2/13/20

hereby move this Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(2), for a protective order to reschedule and relocate the depositions of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Abigail and Leslie Wexner, who received notices of oral deposition to be taken in the offices of Plaintiff's counsel, Gollatz, Griffin & Ewing

ia to the U.S. Virgin Islands for Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell; and New Albany, Ohio for the Wexners. Accordin

31, 1998. Federal government, as landlord, brought proceeding to evict tenants from building. Government moved for partial sum- mary judgment. The District Court, Chin, J., held that: (1) lease unambiguously provided that written consent to sublease was re- quired, precluding claim that government orally co

him. Afterwards, Carlos Sires ("Sires"), a partner at the Firm's Fort Lauderdale office, emailed Dershowitz saying Jeffrey Epstein's compatriot, Ghislaine Maxwell. that Defendant had a "very strong appearance on the (Schiller Decl. Ex. I2 at ¶ 8). Today [S]how" and informing him, "If there is anythi

ards, Carlos Sires ("Sires"), a partner at the Firm's Fort Lauderdale office, emailed Dershowitz saying Jeffrey Epstein's compatriot, Ghislaine Maxwell. that Defendant had a "very strong appearance on the (Schiller Decl. Ex. I2 at ¶ 8). Today [S]how" and informing him, "If there is anything I Sir

his is a subject on which reasonable men may differ." Reynolds v. Pegler 223 F.2d at 433. In M. MtucwelMas she does here, alleged that defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's statements in that case were made "with malice and knowledge of their falsity." 165 F. Supp. 3d at 155. This was a sufficient pleading to defeat a

Court:] You argue at page 5 of your reply that if Ms. Maxwell's simple denials destroyed the plaintiffs reputa

and others by claiming that she was forced to engage in sexual activity with him. Defendant moved to dismiss and to disqualify law firm Holdings: The District Court, Loretta A. Preska, Senior District Judge, held that: III single publication rule did not apply to bar claim on limitations grounds; (2) plaintif

927, In the 151st Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Law Firm: Arnold & Itkin LLP 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case #: I :15-cv-07433 United States District Court Southern District of New York Law Firms: Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP and

16 Deposition Report Plaintiff Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case #: I :15-cv-07433 United States

tion Report Plaintiff Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. Case #: I :15-cv-07433 United States

TRICS, LLC fka SPUR DIGITAL ., dba SPUR INTERACTIVE and STEVE LATHAM VS ADOMETRY, INC. fka CLICK FORENSICS, INC. Cause 2012-44351 / Court: 281. (The District Court of Travis County, Texas.) Law Firms: Watts & Guerra LLP and DiNovo Price Ellwanger & Hardy LLP 77 EFTA00601653 Year Retained Deliverables R

Brown v. Maxwell, — F.3d — (2019) 2019 WL 2814839 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Julie BROWN,

citation is currently available. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Julie BROWN, Miami Herald Company, Intervenors-Appellants, v. Ghislaine MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee, v. MM. Plaintiff-Appellee. . r owitz, Michael Cernovich, dba Cernovich Media, Intervenors-Appellants, v. Plaintiff-App

ating accusations. In response to the allegations, on January 3, 2015, Maxwell's publiSid a press statement declaring that allegations "against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue" and that her "claims are obvious lies."6 6 SeMIEv. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428, 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2018). BM Sues Maxwell On

a District Court ruled that federal prosecutors had violated the CVRA by failing to adequately notify the two victims-plaintiffs of the plea deal. The District Court has not yet determined the appropriate remedy. See Doe 1 v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1204-17 (S.D. Fla. 2019). On December 30, 2014, t

18-2868; 16-3945-cv(L) Brown v. Maxwell; Dershotvitz v. Giuffre 3n tlje Elute)) i§tateo Court of appeat55 for the i§ecortb Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 No. 18-2868-cv JULIE BROWN, MIAMI H

tateo Court of appeat55 for the i§ecortb Circuit AUGUST TERM 2018 No. 18-2868-cv JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD COMPANY, Intervenors-Appellants, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee, v. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 16-3945-cv(L) No. 17-1625 (CON) No. 17-1722(CON) ALAN M. DERSHOW

ons. In response to the allegations, on January 3, 2015, Maxwell's publicist issued a press statement declaring that Giuffre's allegations "against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue" and that her "claims are obvious lies. "6 B. Giuffre Sues Maxwell On September 21, 2015, Giuffre filed the underlying action against

da District Court ruled that federal prosecutors had violated the CVRA by failing to adequately notify the two victims- plaintiffs of the plea deal. The District Court has not yet determined the appropriate remedy. See Doe 1 v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1204-17 (S.D. Fla. 2019). 2 Doe 1 v. United States