Epstein Secrets

UTINE Date: 03/12/2007 To: Miami From: Miami PB2/PBCRA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By:• Case ID #: 31E-MM-108062 (Pending) Title: IN; GHISLAINE N. MA WELL WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION Synopsis: To remove writer as co-case agent. Details: Due to writer's transfer from the Miami Division, PBCRA, to

A From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: SA Jason R. Richards Approved By: Drafted By :jrr Case ID #: 31E-MM-108062 (Pending) Title: FFREv P IN; GHISLANE MAXWEL ; WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION Synopsis: To request travel reference captioned' matter. Administrative: between SA Jason R. Richards and SSA on 0

o: New York Attn: III From: Miami PB-2/PBCRA Contact: SA Approved By: Drafted By:a Case ID $: i 3ZE—MM-108062 (Pending) Title: EF v IN; H LAZNE MAXWELL; WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION Synopsis: To request travel reference captioned matter. Administrative: Reference tel al' between SA E. Nesbitt Kuyrke

know that she had female for him. con other information about said that GHISLAI L traveled to the residence with EPS-EIN on occasion. believed MAXWELL to be EPSTEIN's girlfriend, at first. However, when other females accompanied EPSTEIN. MAXWELL would take another bedroom in the residence. calli

Case ID #: 31E-MM-108062 (Pending) Title: IN; GHISLAINE N. MA WELL WSTA - CHILD PROSTITUTION Synopsis: To

LNU. EFTA01689197 FD-302a (Rev. 1049$) 31E-MM-108062 OmlinualiondFD402of Mo 02/02/2007 ,Page 4 40) 6/26/2005 Down $200.004ish req. by GM - stated that the nam ould have been and GHISLAINE MAXWELL requested that he pay LNU. o 4) 9/2 pill 0 Cash - EPSTEIN or requested pay LNU.

LIN on occasion. believed MAXWELL to said that GHISLAINE MAXWELL traveled to the residence be EPSTEIN's girlfrien

14 UST 1845 TIAS 10812 47 Stat. 2122 16 UST 2066 EFTA01689254 Extradition Treaty Sinned:. Entered Into Force; YLIM: Tonga Tonga Trinidad-Tobago Turkey Tuvalu Tuvalu United Kingdom United Kingdom Protocol United Kingdom Uruguay Venezuela Yugoslavia Zambia Zimbabwe December 22, 1931

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

nherent in the act of extradition when facing what is likely to be long criminal trial process in another country Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago [2009] 1 WLR 1038, para. 36; Norris v Government of United States of America [2007] 1 WLR 1730. 1922623.1 9 EFTA00065611 interest in these offe

he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:

nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate

she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio

ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif

law) • Important drug cases involving international issues and organized crimes (Morocco, Lebanon, Holland, Germany, GB), including 4 tons cocaine Tobago clipper case EFTA00065699 LEGAL ADVICE • Presidential party members and officials in Dakar, Senegal • Former Tunisian Ambassador in Paris and

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

nherent in the act of extradition when facing what is likely to be long criminal trial process in another country Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago [2009] 1 WLR 1038, para. 36; Norris v Government of United States of America [2007] 1 WLR 1730. 1922623.1 9 EFTA00073555 interest in these offe

he European Court of Human Rights Part II — The likely outcome of an extradition request from the United States of America to France in the case of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell A. General bars to extradition B. The protection of nationals from extradition under French law and the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France:

nal ties of Ms Ghislaine Maxwell and her French nationality appear as one of the grounds for which bail was denied by the Court, which found that: "Ms Maxwell's history and characteristics support the position of her posing a risk of flight. Ms Maxwell has substantial international ties and could facilitate

she has signed an irrevocable Waiver in the USA; the fact that in the present situation, the only way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of very strict bail conditions, and the fact that a failure by French authorities to grant extraditio

ection of nationals from extradition in the French legal system and in the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France (B). It will conclude that Ms Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition from France to the USA would not be legally barred by her French citizenship, and that it is highly unlikely, under the specif

law) • Important drug cases involving international issues and organized crimes (Morocco, Lebanon, Holland, Germany, GB), including 4 tons cocaine Tobago clipper case EFTA00154467 LEGAL ADVICE • Presidential party members and officials in Dakar, Senegal • Former Tunisian Ambassador in Paris and

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

nherent in the act of extradition when facing what is likely to be long criminal trial process in another country Gomes v Government of Trinidad and Tobago [2009] 1 WLR 1038, para. 36; Norris v Government of United States of America [2007] 1 WLR 1730. 1922623.1 9 EFTA00154423 interest in these offe

EN Friland Fl France FR Germany GM Greece OR Hungary HU Iceland IC I

Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovak Republic . . Slovenia South Africa Span Sri Lanka Sweden Switzerland Thailand Trinidad 8 Tobago Tunisia Turkey UkraMe United Kingdom Venezuela Other Countries MT MX MO NL NZ NO PK RP PL PO RO RS LO SI SF SP CE SW SZ

ins Lashing Jamaica as 'Catastrophic' Category 5 Storm • China Pushes to Silence Victims of African Mining Disaster • Prince Andrew Hosted Epstein, Maxwell and Weinstein at Royal Lodge • The 92-Year-Old President Who Never Loses • Iranian Women Flout Law on Mandatory Veiling as Police Curtail Arrests

ds Requests INTERNATIONAL NEWS • Turkish Prosecutors File New Espionage Charges Against Istanbul's Jailed Mayor • US Warship Docks in Trinidad and Tobago, Putting More Pressure on Venezuela • Trump Praises Japan's 'Great' Female Leader in Talks on Trade, Critical Minerals • Iran, Russia and the New Z

In order to assure the US authorities that she will not attempt to contest her extradition as a French citizen or otherwise, we are informed that Ms Maxwell is about to execute an irrevocable waiver of her right to seek the protection of the French Courts to fight • 75017 paris • tel. — fax. www.wjavo

William JULIE avocet a la cour— attorney at law Ghislaine Maxwell Opinion on French Extradition Law OVERV

ly way the issue would be raised in France is if Ms. Maxwell would have already fled to France in violation of

the time remaining to be served must be at least six months." 41. There is no doubt that the conduct referred to in the Grand Jury charges against Ms Ghislaine Maxwell, contained in the Superseding Indictment SI 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), filed on July 8th, 2020, also constitutes criminal conduct under French law, as the cr