Epstein Secrets

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

sideration, absconded from ongoing proceedings that would otherwise have resulted in her trial in the US. As the English High Court expressed it in Tollman "the very fact that the accused invokes justice to prevent [their] extradition requires consideration of the circumstances which have led to the fac

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

sideration, absconded from ongoing proceedings that would otherwise have resulted in her trial in the US. As the English High Court expressed it in Tollman "the very fact that the accused invokes justice to prevent [their] extradition requires consideration of the circumstances which have led to the fac

Felicity (p) 870 2 5 $007 Untistediondon Ilene Eningt000d unksted(0870 225 5007 Minicabs 0800-654321 Nags Head icynn Mole USW liati Maxwell, Shisiaine ( 44 IGnnerton SU t hgRnifroV )SWIX 8ES 0/15743 A h) Email: 2 12 2 e21to/1 (Hmitedex pacAage Simon Ed wanes Alexander Mann Global Markets

jganne Brunt 31(01616 300862 Barry! Amster- dam 310 21 279rany(LA) 0776 765 52 Maxine cell 631 329 386 Maxine NY 0700037873 Lisa dstress . 44 GM dstress membership I 077 4768 5190 Bente Palazo (Stroll's) 0780 22 6109 Alan Coles (os- teopth) 0207 251 6109 Felicity (Thai mass") 79 .40 733

.40 7332 Felicity (p) 870 2 5 $007 Untistediondon Ilene Eningt000d unksted(0870 225 5007 Minicabs 0800-654321 Nags Head icynn Mole USW liati Maxwell, Shisiaine ( 44 IGnnerton SU t hgRnifroV )SWIX 8ES 0/15743 A h) Email: 2 12 2 e21to/1 (Hmitedex pacAage Simon Ed wanes Alexander Mann Glob

17 1 2111 rulon (p) 1 8 fl Sheridon (b) i 881 998 ymar (b) , 61 2 7 14:: Plemion (w) (faciaksl) 61 as ymnast ), y (F miast) Maxwell, Ghislaine 358 El grille Pean 8e,;ida 33480 001 561 001 561 4 2 218 com oo I 407 346 7141 Mercedes 001 407 655 3704 1 is 1 54 Pompan 2iu 80g3957 g

and Jimmy .44 795 183 524 9 East 79th Street Tollman, Bea 011 207 235 9251 Tollman, Brett 465 P rk Avenue N 22 (h) Dol 914 4 2177 (country) Tollman, Mr. & Mrs. 485 Park Avenue Nov 00 O1 Tollman, Syrle & Gavin 21 EBSt 93rd St 1 Taman, VVyne 641 A 034E al) TouPb, Ve A ronica (Busson) 5

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

sideration, absconded from ongoing proceedings that would otherwise have resulted in her trial in the US. As the English High Court expressed it in Tollman "the very fact that the accused invokes justice to prevent [their] extradition requires consideration of the circumstances which have led to the fac

Exhibit U EFTA00011192 --- PAGE BREAK --- IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL Overview 1. This Opinion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail

ting to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waiver of her right to extradition that could be exhibited to a future extradition request made by the United States and relied upon

States prior to trial and in breach of bail. I The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Manvell, dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defe

United Kingdom". 28. It is highly unlikely that Ms. Maxwell would be able to establish that the US prosecutor

. 17; and Crean v Government o( Ireland [2007] EWHC 814 (Admin) at para. 21; Henderson pans. 19-26. 7° Government of the United States of America v Tollman [2008] EWHC 184 (Admin), para. 53. 71 'Relevant activity' means activity which is material to the commission of the extradition offence and is alleg