Epstein Secrets

ority of the bars that might be relied upon by Ms Maxwells require the extradition judge to make a finding

ts, a review that formed the basis of changes to the 2003 Extradition Act. (Id. Annex B ¶ 3.1). In Mr. Perry's opinion, it is "highly unlikely that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States" in connection with this case. (Perry Rep. 12(e)). After concluding that none

ide any answer on this issue. 2 The DOJ Memorandum and the Peterson Case In support of its argument that the French government would not extradite Ms Ghislaine Maxwell to the USA, the government relies on the case of Mr Hans Peterson, a dual French American citizen whose extradition to the US was denied by

seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers

r, CO 80203 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell II EFTA00093319 cailase:20-agloDacument ntlinfiAtIllf0891, 806E128B2Blage34figrl 3tI 4 Exhibit A EFTA00093320 Ckast.20-U-0003.00dblit DOditrehlei

noted in the Opinion" the majority of extradition cases conclude within two years, or three months in cases where consent to extradition is given. David Perry QC 6KBW College Hill 17 December 2020 k Extradition Act 2003, ss. 93(4 Xb), 126(2) and 179(2). 9 Extradition Act 2003, s. 93(4Xc) and (6A). I° Extr

ion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail proceedings relating to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waive

of time since the alleged commission of the offences62. The courts have upheld orders for extradition in cases with similar timescales to those in Ms Maxwell's case, including two cases involving historic allegations of sexual offending where the relevant time period was 20 and 33 years. In both cases, the

d States prior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defen

rior to trial and in breach of bail. The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Maxwell dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defendant date

one, where the requested person consents to their extradition, the extradition process is likely to take between one and three months to complete. David Perry QC 6KBW College Hill 8 October 2020 1922623.1 14 EFTA00073560 Annex A EFTA00073561 Annex A — Ouestions set out in the Peters and Peters instru

Exhibit B EFTA00074068 IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL ADDENDUM OPINION 1. This Addendum Opinion is provided in response to the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendant's Renewed Motion

ngs in the United States prior to trial and in breach of bail; and (c) on the basis of the information currently known, it is highly unlikelyt that Ghislaine Maxwell would be able successfully to resist extradition to the United States in relation to the charges in the superseding indictment dated 7 July 2020. I

seding indictment dated 7 July 2020. In addition to those conclusions, the following three points may be made. 3. First, as noted in the Opinion2, Ms Maxwell's waiver of extradition would be admissible in any extradition proceedings in England and Wales. While such a document cannot compel a requested pers

ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL ADDENDUM OPINION 1. This Addendum Opin

oted in the Opinion13 the majority of extradition cases conclude within two years, or three months in cases where consent to extradition is given. David Perry QC 6KBW College Hill 17 December 2020 3 Extradition Act 2003, ss. 93(4Xb), 126(2) and 179(2). 9 Extradition Act 2003, s. 93(4)(c) and (6A). I° Extr

Exhibit U EFTA00011192 --- PAGE BREAK --- IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL Overview 1. This Opinion is provided pursuant to instructions from Peters and Peters Solicitors LLP I dated 12 August 2020 in the context of bail

ting to Ms Ghislaine Maxwell before the United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Subsequent instructions have confirmed that Ms Maxwell will execute a waiver of her right to extradition that could be exhibited to a future extradition request made by the United States and relied upon

States prior to trial and in breach of bail. I The following documents were annexed to the instructions: (a) Superseding Indictment United States v Ghislaine Manvell, dated 8 July 2020; (b) a transcript of the arraignment and bail hearing that took place on 14 July 2020; (c) the Motion to Detain the Defe

United Kingdom". 28. It is highly unlikely that Ms. Maxwell would be able to establish that the US prosecutor

one, where the requested person consents to their extradition, the extradition process is likely to take between one and three months to complete. David Perry QC 6KBW College Hill 8 October 2020 1922623.1 14 EFTA00011206 --- PAGE BREAK --- Annex A EFTA00011207 --- PAGE BREAK --- Annex A - Ouestions