Epstein Secrets

tively be scheduled for November 5, 2021. Additional details will be provided if and when any motions are filed. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated October 14, 2021 (Dkt.

led. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

ns are filed. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Th

412(c) motion by eleven days given the complex nature of the action and the volume of evidence that will likely be presented at trial."); see also Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, 23 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid. § 5377 (2d ed. 2020) (explaining that the text of Rule 412(c)(1)(B) "suggests that the court might r

ed arguments that purely intrastate conduct could not be prosecuted under the federal Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 ("CPPA"). First, in Maxwell, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) was not unconstitutional as applied to a defen- dant's intrastate possession of child por- nography, even

May 7, 2007, pending this panel's final decision. Today, we confirm our prior ruling and grant the government's (unopposed) motion. FN3.See a1so3 Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice & Procedure § 524 (3d ed.) (reporting that Rule 32 was amended to respond to "the concern that the vitally important sen

tively be scheduled for November 5, 2021. Additional details will be provided if and when any motions are filed. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated October 14, 2021 (Dkt.

led. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Govern

ns are filed. SO ORDERED. Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Th

412(c) motion by eleven days given the complex nature of the action and the volume of evidence that will likely be presented at trial."); see also Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, 23 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Evid. § 5377 (2d ed. 2020) (explaining that the text of Rule 412(c)(1)(B) "suggests that the court might r