Epstein Secrets

uly 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance

hern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring

Relentless Pursuit after Ms. Maxwell's arrest from "My fight for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein" to "My fight for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell."6 These examples do not amount to a drop in the bucket of the overwhelming press against Ms. Maxwell, which has been instigated or fueled

Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an app

ly request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co

witnesses. The "circus atmosphere" and "hostile" press that led to a reversal in the Sam Sheppard case are no match for what is occurring here. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) (reversing conviction based on hostile television and radio reporting of case: "Given the pervasiveness of modern c

uly 9, 2021 VIA EMAIL TO CHAMBERS The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance

hern District of New York Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an appearance in connection with her trial before Your Honor, the Government submitted a letter "to bring

Relentless Pursuit after Ms. Maxwell's arrest from "My fight for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein" to "My fight for the victims of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell."6 These examples do not amount to a drop in the bucket of the overwhelming press against Ms. Maxwell, which has been instigated or fueled

Nathan: Even though I do not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any proceedings and have never entered an app

ly request that the Court deny the Government's request for the following reasons: I. The local rules do not apply as I do not currently represent Ghislaine Maxwell in any proceeding and have not entered an appearance in this Court. Because undersigned counsel does not currently represent Ms. Maxwell in any co

witnesses. The "circus atmosphere" and "hostile" press that led to a reversal in the Sam Sheppard case are no match for what is occurring here. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) (reversing conviction based on hostile television and radio reporting of case: "Given the pervasiveness of modern c

nd imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on

to give evidence in two separate legal cases involving Jeffrey Epstein, his paedophile friend, The Daily Telegraph has learnt. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghlslalne Maxwell stayed at Sandringham as guests of the Duke Photo: ALBANPIX/GEOFF PUGH By Jon Swaloaffittpy/wwyttelegtqph.cQulgourtialists/Jan-swairte/1., in Palm B

ames and celebrities like Katie Couric, George Stephanopoulos and Woody Allen. Perhaps they too should have known better. _ . ROYAL CONNECTIONS ■ Gitialaine Maxwell, 49, youngest daughter of Robert Maxwell, the former Dolly Mirror proprietor, is considered one of Prince Andrew's more controversial friends. A de

ne of Prince Andrew's more controversial friends. A decade ago, he was reported to have accompanied her to a "hookers and pimps" party in New York. Ghislaine moved to the US in i991 after the death of her father and became a fixture on the Manhattan party circuit, where she befriended Jeffrey Epstein. ■

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson, 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the

ein Accuser Urged FBI to Investigate Trump Decades Ago The Guardian (07/21, Staff Writer) reported that S an artist who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sexual assault in 1996, claims she urged the FBI to investigate Donald Trump and others close to Epstein at the time. According to the a

artist who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sexual assault in 1996, claims she urged the F

Tarik Sheppard for $10 million over claims that he was too old and "mentally not fit". According to the article, the lawsuit alleges that Adams and Sheppard made defamatory statements about Donlon's mental health after he filed a federal lawsuit accusing them of running a criminal operation in the NYPD.

. Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limit

Miami Herald Publishing Co, v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976). Cowls in Florida may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v - 2 - EFTA00599555 CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 X:OO:MB AQ Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 161. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); Sentinel Communic

nd imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the court on c

ubstantial and imminent threat to a fair trial in Epstein v. Edwards. In Florida, a court may take steps to protect against pretrial publicity. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348 (1966); Sentinel Communications Co. v. Watson 615 So. 2d 768, 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). The limitations imposed by the

ontrol and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976);

cretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. reL Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (

ontrol and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910 (Fla. 1976)

cretion to control and prohibit such extrajudicial commentary and pretrial publicity in order to insure that Mr. Epstein receives a fair trial. See Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 348, 86 S. Ct. 1507, 16 L. Ed. 2d 600 (1966); State ex. rel. Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. McIntosh, 340 So. 2d 904, 910

room stair AC 8 - 6th floor movie room AC 10- security office AC 13- laundry AC 16- Cellar area pressing/garbage room AC 17- 505 south bed room g. max office Note: Same maintenance as AC1-4; see owner's manual, section 3, page 4. 'The information contained in this document is confidential and is i

special ginger drink (existing recipe to be attached). Dinner: includes steak, hamburgers, chicken parmesan, seafood, fresh vegetables steamed, and Sheppard's pie. Entertainment Entertainment includes having friends over for meals in the dining room or appetizers in the living room, watching movies in