Epstein Secrets

v128776550 ilalyy_Gm_00027gtege 2 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00138503 EFTA01279112 SUBS Resource Management Account December 2016 Account name: GHISLAINE MA (WELL Friendly account n • I v nn m Account number. Change in the value of your account Summary of gains and losses December 2016 (1) Year t

ohy_Gm_000278O5te 4 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00 I 38505 EFTA01279114 *UBS Resource Management Account December 2016 Your assets Account name: GIIISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name:Indy Millennium Account number: Some pnCeS, inCOMe and current vaues ShoNn may I:tent:40,0We. ASS felt*. gains and losses ma

Iles Financial Services Inc Private Wealth Management 299 Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 CHF70056271090717Y2Y1 0 Account name: GHIStANE MAXWELL Friendly account nam • I v Mil nnium Account number. Your financial Advisor: SCOTT STACK MANILYLE CASRIEL Phone 212-821.70001800.308-3140 Ques

rivate Wealth Management 299 Park Avenue 25th Floor New York NY 10171.0002 CNP70078411351216X12 YI 0 Resource Management Account December 2016 GHISLAINE MAXWELL P.O. BOX 308 TEANECK NJ 07666-0308 Account name: GfraStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy. Millennium Account number. Your financial Advis

NP70078411351216X12 YI 0 Resource Management Account December 2016 GHISLAINE MAXWELL P.O. BOX 308 TEANECK NJ 07666-0308 Account name: GfraStANE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy. Millennium Account number. Your financial Advisor SCOTT STACK MANILYLE CAST EL Phone 212-821.70001800.308-3140 Que

est income 50.88 2i) 0 Change in rnarkot vat* 533,739.00 Value of your raceme on Dec 30, 2016 $663,739,00 Dec 2015 Noe 201E Dec 2016 SDNY GM 00027882 Member SIPC CNP701I0007641135 NrS0C03I0I36 C0003 1216 030575004 Ng 28776550 1100C0 Page 1 of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA_00 138502 EFTA0127911

of 6 CONFIDENTIAL EFTA 00138511 EFTA01279120 Resource Management Account Ti) 'I " 2 -1 - Change in the value of your account Account name: GHISLAINE MAXWELL Friendly account name: Indy Millennium Account number. January 2017 Year to date (I) Opening account value 5683,739.00 $683,739.00 Ch

es or otherwise Accounts tranferred to the Finn may reflect gar/loss nIcrmaticn only for the period ol tine they me hard r the Rim More hittorkal Harriet i:a cube aided by ear Rancid Advisor. • Unrealized painorantes When data is heath. estmated smelted gaindlones an calculated kr ratan! retry lots

LING PALM BEACH LLC OTTO,JONATHAN B MAXWELL,GERTRUDE COLEMAN,CATHERINE FISHER,K

DON,SUSAN S LEVERRIER INC ZIMMERMAN,HARRIET M SOTER,WILLIAM J ST EDWARDS PARISH

ed arguments that purely intrastate conduct could not be prosecuted under the federal Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 ("CPPA"). First, in Maxwell, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) was not unconstitutional as applied to a defen- dant's intrastate possession of child por- nography, even

ial Deputy Atty. Get, Rhoda'. Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard K. Sharpies', Deputy Atty. Honolulu, T. H., for sr pellants. Bouslog & Symonds and Harriet Bous- log, all of Honolulu, T. H., for appellees. Thomas M. Waddoups, Samuel P. King, Edward N. Sylva, H. R. Hewitt, W. B. Stephenson and J. Donov

mbitions for cybernetic concepts, however, and in 7he Human Use of Human Beings he spells out his thoughts on its application to topics as diverse as Maxwell’s Demon, human language, the brain, insect metabolism, the legal system, the role of technological innovation in government, and religion. These broa

, because while the human knows the reward function, the robot doesn’t—even though the robot’s job is to maximize it. A simple example: Suppose that Harriet, the human, likes to collect paper clips and staples and her reward function depends on how many of each she has. More precisely, if she has p paper

mbitions for cybernetic concepts, however, and in 7he Human Use of Human Beings he spells out his thoughts on its application to topics as diverse as Maxwell’s Demon, human language, the brain, insect metabolism, the legal system, the role of technological innovation in government, and religion. These broa

, because while the human knows the reward function, the robot doesn’t—even though the robot’s job is to maximize it. A simple example: Suppose that Harriet, the human, likes to collect paper clips and staples and her reward function depends on how many of each she has. More precisely, if she has p paper