Epstein Secrets

on Kikka Claudio FW: Out of state subpoenas Joint W/P Priv. 10264-10266 08/09/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson RE:Epstein-Letter regarding Leslie Wexner Joint W/P Priv. 1 EFTA00602835 Privilege Log— Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe. Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRI

radley Edwards RE:Motion for protective order/discussion Joint W/P Priv. 11430-11434 08/27/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards Discussion RE:Wexner involvement Joint W/P Priv. 11443 09/17/2009 Katherine Ezell Bradley Edwards Wexner served subpoena OH Joint W/P Priv. 11541-11542 09/29/200

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

iscovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11105-11110 09/09/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley Edwards Disseminate letter from Wexner attorney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11568 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Meeting with Leslie Wexner Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

nably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11105-11110 09/09/2009 Disseminate letter from Wexner attorney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence

ant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11568 10/07/2009 Meeting with Leslie Wexner Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at I Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

on Kikka Claudio FW: Out of state subpoenas Joint W/P Priv. 10264-10266 08/09/2009 Adam Horowitz Jacquie Johnson RE:Epstein-Letter regarding Leslie Wexner Joint W/P Priv. 1 EFTA00310048 Privilege Log — Dated 2-23-2011 Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCR

radley Edwards RE:Motion for protective order/discussion Joint w/P Priv. 11430-11434 08/27/2009 Spencer Kuvin Bradley Edwards Discussion RE:Wexner involvement Joint W/P Priv. 11443 09/17/2009 Katherine Ezell Bradley Edwards Wexner served subpoena Oil Joint W/P Priv. 11541-11542 09/29/20

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

iscovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11105-11110 09/09/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley Edwards Disseminate letter from Wexner attorney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence

ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 11568 10/07/2009 Paul Cassell Bradley Edwards Meeting with Leslie Wexner Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

No. Q. What is your residence address, sir? A. My address is Page 8 1 of a lot of residents in Palm Beach. And I got to know 2 Jeffrey through Lesley Wexner. And I used to work in 3 about 20 different, 20.25 different homes in Palm Beach 4 as a maintenance guy. 5 Q. Okay. 6 A. And I have basically

house. 12 Q. I'm sorry? 13 A. He just had bought the house -- 14 Q. Okay. 15 A. -- where he live on El Brillo. And he hire me 16 through Mr. Wexner's references to do repair works. And 17 basically what I did the most was taking walls apart, 18 windows and stuff that he didn't want to have it

44 22 one: 22 23 (Via tekpbone) 23 24 24 25 25 Page 6 Page 8 I Appearances contimied... 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 On behalf of the Plaintiff. Jane Doe II: 3 ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA, ESQUIRE 2 — — — GARCIA EI.K1NS & BOEHRINGER 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video 4 I record. This is Media No.