Epstein Secrets

1ey$ onrwsnd lOnr• be. Form 1099. 5498. "O wn"' Ward you tae mum the inn is mound by two to sew tot*

eeeeldnladd bon maya the adore amps", undtmentro the annuityaromas, "axes sa the intanneA aerpenel 1pglalat of Pa uric ennwnwit mots "death" - Adair to annuls. receted tran the aid." and tab of " ~stalls. we "tor di Abate teem? an asv6~d ~e, Haring payment frorrelantShres durloi.don. well

l than may of the mance corvine, undenienno to mutt oreradt, aflame: of the 110.fariCe tcapanot tp00•63 of the une naturism butt Malaita% - In Adair, to anemeSerry Waned Iran the thethase and sale of honied finds. we "tor or althea went an assettvied resent* shoring cement from lantShres chtri

15,432 44 Vout Wriestrrent return. 43.9 11.9 °ward and interest axon* $875 36.5 • Change in ma

wnhoter dens al the sane rotor I you prefer to metro. rod rad statements mailed re coparato NOWN01:01, you may dorm hair:Aro by cdro you financial Adair Prindy mown name lariat* Waal NM. it a. tistamtible •ruckrara• chosen by you to art you wit you reafdlteepto t la no kgol effect en your accost i

stimates of yak* aro as of a torten date and are ward to UPS Fnancial Services on a regale basis by an

co informatim obtained Wom sources other than UPS finacxialSen•Ces, exhaling nformatico from another dm a that you may have provided to you fatal Adair. The fa don not ivitpenicrebi cr gain the accuri play of ary Wombed added by sasses Oa than L65 Financial Seniors h ddlips aftecugh LOS financi

t aly a MO inmate mestrnert stoutly a PruCtured ward my be [cur a sad aid do not nasally comment the

b U2104001 to the lien mayreflect giriass nlormairs oily for Ine perisd of time they aeheas a the Pion Morehitows Worker cal be added by you Fauna Adair • Unwire dganefbass Whori d ita a amiable ecmreuu fl ea' re meg csset a2 camixed for SDNY_GM_00022934 EFTA_00133554 EFTA01275521 Important inf

cation decision — that is, how it applied the Rule 23 factors -- is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., EQT Prod. Co., 764 F.3d at 357; Ward, 595 F.3d at 179; Monroe v. City of Charlottesville, Va., 579 F.3d 380, 384 (4th Cir. 2009); Gregory v. Finova Capital Corp., 442 F.3d 188, 190 (4th

tion decisions under Rule 23(a)(2), an impact plainly manifested by the number of certifications overturned in its wake. See, e.g., EQT Prod. Co. v. Adair, 764 F.3d 347 (4th Cir. 2014); Rodriguez v. Nat'l City Bank, 726 F.3d 372, 376 (3d Cir. 2013); M.D. ex rel. Stukenberg v. Perry, 675 F.3d 832, 839,