Epstein Secrets

erggirdankiikk ilit Bunn Bociang# Cased Wad Ward Bodergd Cased 14-Akt witelnak)cork€01/ Bads

unty Courthouse 205 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: State of Florida'. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 2006CF009454A Dear Judge McSorley: -n rn Enclosed you will find an Agreed Motion to Continue Trial and a proposed Agreed Order Continuing Trial, Canceling Plea Conference, and Set

. 2P 8Y-- CLERK One Clearlake Centre. Suite 1400 250 Australian Av ue South West Palm Beach. FL 33401 RECEIVED JAN 0 2 2008 Chambers of Judge Sandra K. McSorley p 561.659.8300 1561.835.8691 904WW pa. tom , Case No. 01140796-CVAIARRA '/ P009015 EFTA00190979 -1 • STATE OF FLORIDA vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN

. SR • / Getty Images; Patrick McMullan; Donna Ward/Getty Images; AP) asamst M gistiog artist 23 A

f today's Post stories. and a 30-year prison sentence. Share This Story Mosley and her mother "are people of amazing forgiveness," Belohlavek told McSorley. "They feel like this was a night unlike any other and feel it wouldn't happen again." They also wanted to avoid the stress of a trial, she said.

SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A. YAREMA 'FLORIDA WARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIM lAvAIR 2ADMITTED 70 PRACTIC

"learned from Mr. Epstein's attorney that the plea is scheduled to take place on Monday morning." I also understand that there is an entry on Judge McSorley's docket that a hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. on Monday. Both parties have agreed that it is a material term of the Non-Prosecution Agreement

. SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A. YAREMA 'HONDA WARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMITTLD TO PRACTI

f Corrections . . . . As I learned on Friday when I received the state court file, you neglected to inform our Office that, on July 21, 2008, Judge McSorley modified the judgment nunc pro tunc to an "Order of Community Control I." This same language was the basis for the objection in my letter of June 2

MIOIAEL PIKE HEATHER McNAMARA RUDA I R.ORIDA WARD anima CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTI

ppropriate. Eighth, it is both unreasonable and unjustifiable to hold Mr. Epstein responsible—never mind declare him in breach—with regard to Judge McSorley's nunc pro tune order. Exhibit 1, June 15, 2009 Letter at 3. Neither Mr. Epstein nor defense counsel had anything to do with and certainly no prior