Epstein Secrets

US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Florida Southern (West Palm Beach) 9:08cv8011 9 Doe v. Epstein This case was retrieved from the court on Wednesday, March 04, 2015 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket:

hments: # 1 Exhibit)(Pike, Michael) (Entered: 10/16/2009) 10/16/2009 353 RESPONSE in Opposition re 331 MOTION for Protective Order as to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Attendance at Plaintiff's Deposition and Notice of Incorporation of Notice of Reliance of Supplemental Authority (DE 324) filed by Jeffrey Epstein.

/08.(ir) (Entered: 02/08/2008) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7, 2008, filed by Jane Doe. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jane Doe. Jeffrey Epstein served on 5/7/2008, Answer due 5/27/2008. (lk) (Entered: 05/27/2008)

3/2009) 425 Defendant's MOTION Attend Mediation Defendant Epstein% Motion to Attend Mediation and Memorandum in Su

Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/3/2009. (sa) (Entered: 12/03/2009) 434 ORDER VACATING 413 Omnibus of November 17, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/3/2009. (sa) (Entered: 12/03/2009) 435 ORDER denying as moot 430 Appeal o

eval service. - OR - Call 1.866.540.8818. US District Court Civil Docket U.S. District - Fiorida Souther (West Palm Beach) 9:09cv80469 Doe II'. Epstein et al This case was retrieved from the court on Sunday, July 18, 2010 Date Filed: Assigned To: Referred To: Nature of suit: Cause: Lead Docket

(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 10/21/2009) 10/21/2009 365 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL of Motion by C.M.A. re 331 MOTION for Protective Order as to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's. Attendance at Plaintiff's Deposition filed by C.M.A. DOCKET CORRECTION SEE DE 363 FOR IMAGE (tp) (Entered: 10/22/2009) 10/21/2009 367 REPLY to R

r) (Entered: 04/21/2008) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein on May 7. 2008. filed by Jane Doe No. 4. (Herman. Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/22/2008) Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doe No. 4. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A and B. # 2

0/21/2009) RESPONSE/REPLY to 60 Amended Document Defendant Epstein's Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's F

of Law filed by Jane Doe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/3/2009. (sa) (Entered: 12/03/2009) 12/03/2009 434 ORDER VACATING 413 Omnibus of November 17, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson on 12/3/2009. (sa) (Entered: 12/03/2009) 12/03/2009 435 ORDER denying as moot

136], the Razorback Victims' Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Motion Altering or Amending Order Granting the Motions of the Trustee and Jeffrey Epstein to Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum [DE 137], the Trustee's Response [DE 138], Edward J. Morse's Response [DE 139/140], Morse Operati

motion to depose Rothstein was granted by this Court. The Razorback Victims contend that they are "at the heart" of the Ponzi scheme as compared to Epstein. However, there are some important distinctions between Epstein and the Razorback Victims. First, Epstein's state court action against Rothstein an

ng Order Granting the Motions of the Trustee and Jeffrey Epstein to Issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Test

], the Trustee's Response [DE 138], Edward J. Morse's Response [DE 139/140], Morse Operations, Inc.'s Response [DE 141], and the Razorback Victims' Omnibus Reply [DE 142]. The Court has carefully considered all of these filings and the entire record in this action, and is otherwise fully advised in the