Epstein Secrets

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ___

of the civil proceedings in the “interests of justice” until the “expiration” of the Non- Prosecution Agreement [“NPA”] between the United States and Epstein? By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of any

oes the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein’s performance of his obligations pursuant to the

ng the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. Fo

solved. Thus, contrary to the assertions of Epstein, the delay is not limited but, instead, is “potentially indefinite,” as Sterling Bank warns. If the U.S. Attorney’s Office were to proceed criminally, the litigation would likely be very lengthy, and would result in an even greater delay to the plaintiffs.5 Case 9:0

Post, moyes pursuant to Fla, R. Civ. P. 1.510(a) for Summary Judgment and states: I. INTRODUCTION The material facts in this case are not in dispute. Jeffrey Epstein was an extraordinarily wealthy, influential, and serial pedophile. It is indisputable that the State failed or refused to use the tools available to

therwise available in the public record-to inform the public as to whether the then State Attorney for Palm Beach County presented truncated evidence ofEpstein’s criminal wrongdoing to the 2006 grand jury in a manner that precluded Epstein’s indictment for the serious crimes he committed, including sex traff

effrey Epstein, till when he had been informed of Mr. Epstein’s reputation and his wealth, and I just thought t

e material facts in this case are not in dispute. Jeffrey Epstein was an extraordinarily wealthy, influenti

fProfessional Responsibility at the Department of Justice released the results of its investigation into allegations that in 2007-2008 prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida improperly resolved a federal investigation into the criminal conduct of Jeffrey Epstein by negotiating a

powerful financier was not held accountable for, nor even forced to confront, allegations of serious sex trafficking crimes. While it is clear that Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 deal with the State of Florida was not consistent with the evidence gathered against him, what remains shrouded in mystery is how that evidenc

ederal prosecution." The backroom deal with federal prosecutors is all the more interesting in light of the legal powerhouses who have worked for Epstein1 including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton investigator Kenneth Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the National Association o

York magazine in 2002. "It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Investigation leads to Epstein Although he was not a frequenter of the Palm Beach social scene, he made his presence felt.

is house to give him massages, Goldberger said. "Mr. Epstein absolutely insisted anybody who came to his hous

e descriptions: “Young [Name] + [Name],” “Misc nudes 1,” and “Girl pics nude.” 38. On July 8, 2019, prosecutors with the Public Corruption Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York charged Epstein with sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. The grand jury indictment

lking,. a wave of legal :resistance followed. Editor1sNo.te:. This-arti_ck appeared in The Palm Beach Pos,t on August 14, 200.6, three w~eks after Jrffrey Epstein.:S arrest in.Palm Beach County on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. WINGED GARGOYLES :guarded the gate at Jeffrey Epstein's· Palro Beach

and w~nt. For the police detectives who sifted through the garhageoutsideand kept re:cords of vi'sitors, it was the lair of a trcmbliri& target . .Epstein, one of the most mysterious of the totmtry'smega-rich, was known as much for his ~ecrecy a~ for his lpye of fine tJ:iings:_IIJ.:3.gnificent h_omes,.

g-000141 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY ' I I.he, :M.an" W,b.o i.e:ad :Evet;ythlng.~ Jeffrey: Epsle~n 'Cta:1ed big: h·omes·, elite Jri:ends ,and un.dera'gat:gi'rls B,y. Andrew Marra Pgst-~d)ufi 7., ·2919.~~ 6:02 AM From the archives: When

125 FILb1J: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 2:57:43 PM 41. On July 8,2019, prosecutors with the Public Corruption Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s I I office for the Southern District ofNew York charged Epstein with sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. The grand jury indictme

hat the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and U.S. Attorney’s Office might be arranging a plea bargain for the c

ugh his undersigned counsel, hereby submits this Response in Opposition to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Epstein seeks Summary Judgment on the claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution set forth in Brad Edwards’ Fourth Amended Counterclaim. Each of th

Epstein. Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a nexual preference for young children. Depos

stein hee ‘also ‘Heei sanvedl: “with: nterrogatories ‘ad ‘requests. “for . 7 » production; all requests. have been met: with 5th amendment assertions Pane Epstein’ has not given Tan Ween oe By: ' Jane, Doe's: complaint: contains. a punitive ‘damages: clainn, and Mr Tistein: he “also. . a elected: to tiivoke th

ion that any of those people (other than. . Mr- Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or.any of the other. specific victims of Mr. '- .Epstein’s molestation. Mr. Dershowitz ‘is acting as an ‘attorney for Mr. Epstein, and therefore it is. ; 4 presumably unlikely to question him about any admi

ey had collected regarding Epstein’s sexual abuse of his clients. However, the U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to provide any such information to me. The U.S. Attorney’s Office also declined to provide any such information to the other attorneys who represented victims of Epstein’s sexual assaults. I was informed that

owing specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein’s required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) (“The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse party

Epstein, Sexual Abuse of Children By Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children. Depos

tz (attached hereto as Exhibit “H”), she attached the proposed plea agreement describing Epstein’s witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER” On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a f

ards also requested from the U.S. Attorney’s Office the information that they had collected regarding Epstein’s sexual abuse of his clients. However, the U.S. Attorney’s Office, declined to provide any such information to Edwards. It similarly declined to provide any such information to the other attorneys who represen