Epstein Secrets

hat rea a N was told by EPSTEIN that she w to tell anyone wha nac appened during the massages. began avoid in tel phone calls from EPSTEIN and EPSTE s assistant, stated that on each of Ills to EPSTEIN's residence s e a taken a Xanax. However, stated that she Investigation on 10/30/2006 at

but did not want to be interviewed. However, confirme t at she first met JEFFREY EPSTEIN when she was i een or sixteen years old. She was taker o PSTEIN's residence in Palm Beach by one of her good friends. stated that she provided EPSTEIN ssages and that she a provided these massages alone. sta

n 552); Privacy Act of 1974 (PA) (fide 5, United States Code, Section 552a); andlor Litigation. FOIA/PA Requester: Martin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Identification Number: Title of Case: • File 31E-MM-108082-IA Serials Reviewed: All Litigation ri Executive Order Applied

litssage to EPSTEIN. said that she was paid $20 y EPSTEIN and he had given he r an extra $100.00 to give

FOIA/PA Requester: Martin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Identification Number:

re my top 3. Television I love lucy is the shlt!..lol FAirtyOdd Parents! Books Dont read! Heroes You are my HEROIII_.;) • s Details Status: Swinger Here for: Networking, Dating, Serious Relationships, Friends Orientation: Straight Hometown: Royal Palm-Bitches!! 's Friend Space • has 54

ted. Continental Casualty Co. v. Fibreboard Corp., 4 F.3d 777, 778 (' Cir. 1993). The non-prosecution agreement in this case was signed in 2007, and Epstein entered his pleas of guilty in July 2008, in Florida circuit court. I k was sentenced by the state court, and has served his sentence. Individuals

n for sexually abusing them. During the course of that litigation, in June 2001, they obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel. Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ultimately settled their civil suits in July 2010. During the settlement discussions, they informed Epste

hether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for

in "the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial." Declaration of Marie V

r Court, 464 U.S. 501 (1984)] so as to warrant sealing, and provides good cause under the common-law access balancing test to preclude disclosure. Swinger, 626 F. Supp. 2d at 1235-36 (brackets in original omitted). See also In re Petition of American Historical Ass 'n, 62 F. Supp. 2d 1100, 1103 (S.D.N.

nted. Continental Casualty Co.'. Fibreboard Corp., 4 F.3d 777, 778 (' Cir. 1993). The non-prosecution agreement in this case was signed in 2007, and Epstein entered his pleas of guilty in July 2008, in Florida circuit court. I k was sentenced by the state court, and has served his sentence. Individuals

n for sexually abusing them. During the course of that litigation, in June 2001, they obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel. Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ultimately settled their civil suits in July 2010. During the settlement discussions, they informed Epste

hether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for

in "the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial." Declaration of Marie V

f 10 of access is not absolute and sealing is appropriate in connection with grand jury proceedings. As explained by Judge Jordan in United States. Swinger, 626 F. Supp. 24i 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grandiury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Dougla