Epstein Secrets

vision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear• Mr. Menthe': July 25, 2007 Jeffiry Epstein TELEPHONE la 1E)7370400 m ailman We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or sho

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

.S.C. §2422(b) could or should be brought against Jeffrey Epstein, even assuming the specific conduct that

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA00079456 COURT . ' C ES : i F - .• : FACTS COMMUNIC TION - ., U.S.

RENA FAITH BY HAND of of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern Distri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or should b

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the s

istri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have pr

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports

duction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 43 EFTA01729527 44 EFTA01729528 COURT . - ,-. r. ' , • •lc .f5 , , d • ',

m: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:49 AM To: Menthe', Matthew (USAFLS) Cc: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi Matt - I had hoped to have a revised indictment for our discussion today but Mr. Black's motion has demanded my immediate attention. However, i

ested him. Sentence 13 months; appealed conviction & sentence. Affirmed. CHARG 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART A nationwide search of all cases listing charges under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) underscores the undeniable fact th

ummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART

uction of Internet conversations as prejudicial. Appellate court affirmed — probative value outweighed prejudicial; sentenced 46 months & 3 years supervision & $500 fine. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 47 EFTA00226349 COURT CASES' FACILITY -.. .FACTS/COa1UNICKITON CHARGE •; U.S. I