Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
4 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 7:38 PM To: Rupert Sheldrake Subject: Re: fields are you having fun On Tue, Jul 12, 2016
y, July 30, 2016 7:38 PM To: Rupert Sheldrake Subject: Re: fields are you having fun On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rupert Sheldr=ke vrote: Dear Jeffrey, Thanks for the gra=h. Yes, its a fairly general shape, also seen in species frequencies etc. =till not sure how it might apply to morphic resonanc
, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rupert Sheldr=ke vrote: Dear Jeffrey, Thanks for the gra=h. Yes, its a fairly general
ace tension can probably expla=n the form quite adequately. Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological r=alm. We are off for Canada tomorro= and away for 2 months on a remote island in BC. I hope still to be in
4 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:08 PM To: Rupert Sheldrake Subject: Re: fields Be patient . I will leave you to your holi
en=. . your morphic field forces it into a non random direc=ion. have a good trip. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:=4 AM, Rupert Sheldrake wrote:=br> Dear Jeffrey, Thanks for the gra=h. Yes, its a fairly general shape, also seen in species frequencies etc. =till not sure how it might apply to morphic resonanc
6 at 11:=4 AM, Rupert Sheldrake wrote:=br> Dear Jeffrey, Thanks for the gra=h. Yes, its a fairly general
ace tension can probably expla=n the form quite adequately. Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological r=alm. We are off for Canada tomorro= and away for 2 months on a remote island in BC. I hope still to be in
4 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
From: Rupert Sheldrake Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:54 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: fields Dear =effrey, Thanks for the graph. Yes, =ts a fairly general shape, also seen in species frequencies etc. Still =ot sure how i
hat has come =efore it its very very elegant. =nd as good a theory as any scientist can propose. On Mon, Jul 11, =016 at 6:49 AM, Rupert Sheldrake Dear Jeffrey, Yes, = think Brian Josephson is indeed rather scattered. rote: I don't think =eepak is interested in deep theoretical issues so I don't think you
rake Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:54 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: fields Dear =effrey, Thanks f
sion can probably =xplain the form quite adequately. =/span>Simple physical explanations like surface tension fail when it comes to leaves although D'Arcy Thompson tried to extend them into the biological =ealm. We are off for Canada tomorrow and away for 2 =onths on a remote island in BC. I =ope still to be in
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (6)
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and D'Arcy Thompson
