Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA02607824

6 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

TA02607826 Sweetheart deal!" So goes the attack on the resolutio= of the more than a decade ago federal investigation involving our client =effrey Epstein. The attack is profoundly misplaced, supported neithe= by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported by the structure of our con=titutional republic

oundly misplaced, supported neithe= by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported by the structure of our con=titutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was subjected to an extremel= aggressive federal intrusion into what would typically be considered a qu=ntessentially local criminal matter in south

wrong on the facts and the law. They also ignore a fact going to =he heart of fundamental fairness: In the decade since paying hi= debt to society, Jeffrey Epstein has led a life characterized by responsi=le citizenship, numerous acts of generosity and good deeds.<=> Here are the true key facts:Q Jeffrey Epst

ion, led by the chief of the =ex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then indicted by the state grand=jury on a s

orthodox requ=rements that Mr. Epstein's experienced defense team had never seen=imposed on any defendant anywhere. Under the federally-forced deal, Jeffre= was required to request that 4 EFTA_R1_01799893 EFTA02607827 the state prosecutors demand the imposi=ion of a thirty-month sentence that include

But that's not what this was and tha='s not what happened. That is precisely why the federal=authorities' ultimate decision to defer prosecution to the st=te was the right one. <=u> However, the federally-demanded resolution was not without c=nditions. The federal prosecutors insisted on various unorth

EFTA02608318

5 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

=ike your thoughts Sweetheart deal!" So goes t=e attack on the resolution of the more than a decade ago federal investiga=ion involving our client Jeffrey Epstein. The attack is profoundly m=splaced, supported neither by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported b= the structure of our constitutional republic

oundly m=splaced, supported neither by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported b= the structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey wa= subjected to an extremely aggressive federal intrusion into what would ty=ically be considered a quintessentially local criminal matter in south

ontrary, the Palm Beach State=Attorney's Office conducted an extensive fifteen-month investigation, =ed by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then ind=cted by the state grand jury on a single felony count of solicitation of p=ostitution. During that intense investigation, the state p=

ion, =ed by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then ind=cted by the state grand jury on a s

e same (includi=g his time served) as any other state-incarcerated individuals. =His conduct while in custody was exemplary, and so characterized by the st=te custodial authorities. <=u> Jeffrey Epstein has paid his deb= to society. The challenges to his Agreement with the Government must also be unders

EFTA02608513

5 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

lik= your thoughts Sweetheart deal!" So goes the =ttack on the resolution of the more than a decade ago federal investigatio= involving our client Jeffrey Epstein. The attack is profoundly misp=aced, supported neither by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported by t=e structure of our constitutional republic

foundly misp=aced, supported neither by the law nor the facts. Nor is it supported by t=e structure of our constitutional republic. To the contrary, Jeffrey was s=bjected to an extremely aggressive federal intrusion into what would typic=lly be considered a quintessentially local criminal matter in south

on, =ed by the chief of the Sex Crimes Division. Mr. Epstein was then ind=cted by the state grand jury on a si