Epstein Secrets

From: Peter Mahler To: 'Lesley Groff' <MINII >, Jared Miles Cc: Judith Redd <=I > Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein/Skype Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:59:59 +0000 Lesley Please remind Mr E that we have told the candidates he is the employer but not his name and I

Jared Miles Cc: Peter Mahler; Judith Redd Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein/Skype Jeffrey's Skype address is: jeevacation Please make sure Nigel has Jeffrey's address as well....did you hear from Martin as of yet regarding a skype at 1:30 today? On Jul 8, 2013, at 9:00 PM, Jared Miles wrote: > Of cours

3 PM, Jared Miles C wrote: >> >>> Lesley, >>> Thank you for getting back to us. >>> We have confirmed Nigel Dagnall for a 1pm EDT Skype with Mr. Epstein. >>> His >>> Skype ID is nigel.dagnall >>> We are working to confirm Martin Nicholson for 1:30pm and expect >>> that he will be available for tha

, Peter Mahler .tz > wrote: >>>> >»» Hi Lesley >>>>> >>>>> I hope you had a good 4th >>>>> >>>>> we have 2 director of residence candidates for JE to skype with >>>>> >>>>> we wrote to Rich earlier today but did not hear back from him >>>>> >>>>> I would appreciate your help finding times th

confirmed Nigel Dagnall for a 1pm EDT Skype with Mr. Epstein. >>> His >>> Skype ID is nigel.dagnall >>> We

agnall >>> We are working to confirm Martin Nicholson for 1:30pm and expect >>> that he will be available for that time. He is currently overseas, Enterprises, Inc. EFTA00387772 >>> so our communication with him isn't as expedient as usual. We will >>> forward his Skype ID once we confirm with him the time.

From: Lesley Groff <Ma To: Jared Miles Cc: Peter Mahler a, Judith Redd cz1=I > Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein/Skype Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:39:45 +0000 ok super! to help! I will let Jeffrey know the 1:30 Skype is confirmed with Martin...I'm always here

Cc: Peter Mahler a, Judith Redd cz1=I > Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein/Skype Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:39:45 +0000 ok super! to help! I will let Jeffrey know the 1:30 Skype is confirmed with Martin...I'm always here :) On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Jared Miles wrote: > Lesley, > I will make sure th

with Martin...I'm always here :) On Jul 9, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Jared Miles wrote: > Lesley, > I will make sure that Nigel and Martin both have Mr. Epstein's Skype > address. Martin is confirmed today at 1:30pm Eastern. His Skype address is > babbit50. He is in London and if there are any problems with

>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Lesley >>>>>>> >>>>>» I hope you had a good 4th >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have 2 director of residence candidates for JE to skype with >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we wrote to Rich earlier today but did not hear back from him >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would appreciate your help finding

I will make sure that Nigel and Martin both have Mr. Epstein's Skype > address. Martin is confirmed today at

iles >>> Project Manager and Recruiter >>> Mahler Private Staffin >>> >>> >>> >>> < >>> A division of Mahler >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> • Enterprises, Inc. are fully EFTA00387809 >>> On 7/8/13 5:27 PM, "Lesley Groff" •:: > wrote: >>> >>>> Jared, can you please send me the resumes for just in case!

undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby asks for permission to file a Supplemental ex parte Declaration in support of its Response to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Intervene and to Quash Subpoenas and Cross- Motion to Compel. In support thereof, the United States states the following: 1. The Declara

Accordin 1 , the United States has not previously had the opportunity to respond to the issue raised by EFTA01728790 in footnote 3 of Intervenor Epstein's Reply, counsel asserts that, if "the Court were to sustain the government's standing objection as to Epstein, and would file a motion to quash

TES' PLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: ON TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS U

the computersthe items as they were removed from Mr. Epstein's home. The grand jury probably has the authority

he particular reasons underlying a subpoena threatens to compromise `the indispensable secrecy of the grand kir), proceedings.'" United States v. It Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury