Epstein Secrets

g your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual

mber Agreement still be operative? I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay "VIllatene, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <Ann

ed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enu

e thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay "VIllatene, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> 08/14/2008 12:44 PM To <lefkovinaglerldand.corn> cc "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLST <KerenAtidnsonauscloj.

mber Agreement still be operative? I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay 'vulalana, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <Ann.

e received this 213 EFTA00193287 The modification contained in the December letter is clear and simple, that is why we wcre not surprised by Mr. Epstein's and his attorneys' actions affirming acceptance of the modification. Mr. Epstein's acceptance of the modification by pleading guilty was equally c

actions affirming acceptance of the modification. Mr. Epstein's acceptance of the modification by pleading gui

he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay 'vulalana, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <[email protected], 08/14/2008 12:44 PM To <[email protected]> cc •Atkinson. Karen (USAFLS)" <Karen.Atkinson@usdoj,g

tions of Ms. Groff. We will need to interview her to confirm the accuracy of those facts. On a second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcing him off the road. Or, if there is something more recent related to any grand jury subpoenas, we c

second count, we could rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed father, forcin

ommunity control and probabtion. I am not sure which is more practicable. Please let me know when you are free to speak. Thanks -- Jay "Villafana, Ann Merle C. 1(USAFLS11" <Ann.Marle.C.Villataneausdoj.gov> 09/18/2007 09 14 AM To "Jay Letkovettz" <JLetkowftz(alurkland cams cc Subject RE Draft Agreements?