Epstein Secrets

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00234577 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

/3 0/0 • Dated: Dated: Dated: By: P e tritts TAM 2€ A. MARIE a ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD IJIFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00234642 Exhibit 17 EFTA00234643 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00234616 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

ed during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and takes no position regarding those lawsuits. The U.S. Attorney's Office is not advising or

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

ou promised to afford to us when we last spoke in early January. Best, Jay cc: Jeff EFTA00234606 Exhibit 8 EFTA00234607 Jay, 'Simian, Jeff (USAFLST <[email protected]> 02/29/2008 07:17 PM To <[email protected]> cc bcc Subject Epstein I know you emailed the U.S. Attorney but I fee

***** ********** ***** *********************** ***** 7". EFTA00296594 EFTA00296595 09/23/2007 08:58 PM To "Jay Lentowlle Ma> cc bcc Subject Epstein agreement Hi Jay— Here are the revisions that I agree with and those I don't. We have been over paragraph 6 an infinite number of times. It is fac

15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in viol

24'. >» EFTA00296596 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING

onth windowin case we discover a violation after Mr. Epstein is released. Ido not care if you want to call th

Y EPSTEIN Dated: LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 6 of 6 EFTA00296613 ri EFTA00296614 To 'Jay Letkowitz" > ec \ (USAFLST AIM bcc 09/2412007 Subject RE: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney in 01:27 PM rt I tr ititINVII 1/4: fr. ;SIW W1.4471 U.:e

g your December proposal, there are a couple of things I don't understand. What limits are placed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." In other words, what individuals would have this right? And would these individual

mber Agreement still be operative? I am trying hard to understand what you have intended by the December letter. Alex has says he thinks it benefits Jeffrey, and I am open to understanding it that way. But I would like some clarity on these issues. Thanks -- Jay "VIllatene, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <Ann

ed upon individuals who proceed under 2255 as if "Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enu

Jay "VIllatene, Ann Merle C. (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> 08/14/2008 12:44 PM To <lefkovinaglerldand.corn> cc "Atkinson, Karen (USAFLST <KerenAtidnsonauscloj.goV> Subject Follow-up point Ili Jay — I forgot to mention that I can no longer argue that the Court shouldn't force us to pr