Epstein Secrets

(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: . (USAFLS) nesc )ternber 17, 2008 12:00 PM Your inquiry regarding the Epstein case (USAFLS): Hi Barry — The Non-Prosecution Agreement contains a confidentiality provision that requires us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel befo

6 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) er 17, 2008 11:25 AM • Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); (USAFLS) ate Je (USAFLS) rey Epstein (USAFLS); Lee, Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn't be prope

, Septem 10:50 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); (USAFLS_ Cc: LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. I low would you like to handle this issue? A. Marie Villafatia As

; (USAFLS_ Cc: LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent th

d to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believ

From: Barry Krischer [mailto:[email protected]) Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:46 AM To: Garcia, Rolando USAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge

you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM 14 EFTA00194227

: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State' Jeffrey Epstein Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren

d to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believ

you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM 437 EFTA00190699

Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State'. Jeffrey Epstein Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren

LS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Cc: Garda, Rolando LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. How would you like to handle this issue? A. Marie Vilkfairia Assi

d to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believ

; Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Cc: Garcia, Rojpndo (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State 1 Jeffrey Epstein Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now

you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohlavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Barry Krlscher Subject: FW: State', Jeffrey Epstein 53 EFTA00179877

Garcia, Rojpndo (USAFLS) Subject: RE: State 1 Jeffrey Epstein Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren

d to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believ