Epstein Secrets

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:47 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi info needed

ted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file * ****** ********** ********* *

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2

h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However, the legal is =bundantly cle

tial, may be a=torney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is int=nded only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unau=horized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part th=reof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received t=is

ted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus„ now that we know h= is unlikely to file T=e information contained in this

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2

h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is =bundantly cl

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:01 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi thank you

ted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file T=e information contained in this

se of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffr=y Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this

h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is =bundantly cl