Epstein Secrets

ivision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 41' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i P) 9/313-SI92 We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C.

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports

b); 2252(aX1) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Challenged sentence of 135 months & 2 year supervision. Affirmed. U.S. I Kisor, 104 Fed. Appx. 479 (6" Cir. 2004) Unpublished Internet Internet chat room; 32 yr-old met 16 yr-old; engaged in IM and telephone communication

m: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:49 AM To: Menthe', Matthew (USAFLS) Cc: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi Matt - I had hoped to have a revised indictment for our discussion today but Mr. Black's motion has demanded my immediate attention. However, i

ested him. Sentence 13 months; appealed conviction & sentence. Affirmed. CHARG 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART A nationwide search of all cases listing charges under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) underscores the undeniable fact th

ummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART

); 2252(a)(1) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting Challenged sentence of 135 months & 2 year supervision. Affirmed. U.S. I Kisor, 104 Fed. Appx. 479 (6th Unpublished Internet Internet chat room; 32 yr-old met 16 yr-old; engaged in IM and telephone 2422(b) Cir. 2004) comm

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

defendant-appellant Miguel Plascencia-Alvarado. Jeffrey E. Ellis, Law Offices of Ellis, Holmes & Witchley,

exual acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Kisor now appeals, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to ask one of Kisor's tendered questions to the jury during voir dire. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM. C 2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.

ntice, coerce and attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce a minor to engage in prohibited sexual acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Kisor now appeals, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to ask one of Kisor's tendered questions to the jury during voir di