Epstein Secrets

vision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear• Mr. Menthe': July 25, 2007 Jeffiry Epstein TELEPHONE la 1E)7370400 m ailman We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or sho

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

.S.C. §2422(b) could or should be brought against Jeffrey Epstein, even assuming the specific conduct that

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports

a. 2006) Slip Copy No Information No specific information available. Defendant sought recusal because judge served as Chairman of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. M

ivision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 41' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i P) 9/313-SI92 We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C.

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports

information available. Indictment not accessible; no media information. Defendant sought recusal because judge served as Chairman of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information 65 EFTA00224199 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION

RENA FAITH BY HAND of of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern Distri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or should b

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the s

istri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have pr

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports

2006) Slip Copy No In ti formaon No specific information available. Defendant sought recusal because judge served as Chairman of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(6) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Flicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D.

m: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 8:49 AM To: Menthe', Matthew (USAFLS) Cc: Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Hi Matt - I had hoped to have a revised indictment for our discussion today but Mr. Black's motion has demanded my immediate attention. However, i

ested him. Sentence 13 months; appealed conviction & sentence. Affirmed. CHARG 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART A nationwide search of all cases listing charges under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) underscores the undeniable fact th

ummated Showed up for meeting 2 EFTA00226394 JEFFREY EPSTEIN 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) CASE ANALYSIS CHART

information available. Indictment not scressible; no media information. Defendant sought recusal because judge served as Chairman of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(6); 2423(b) No Information 65 EFTA00226331 . ., FACILITY . . 'FACTS/COMMUNICATION

da, October 16, 1987. 24. Kalt JP, Dietz PE, Cox JE Jr.: Economics and the Environment: New Challeng

torney, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, in State v. Jeffrey L. Dahmer (serial murders of men) Consultant to

Research Institute, Purdue University Committee on Trauma Research, National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences Commissioner, Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, United States Department of Justice United States Delegate, Chancellor Helmut Kohl's Neurosciences and Ethics Conference, Bonn and