Epstein Secrets

vision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear• Mr. Menthe': July 25, 2007 Jeffiry Epstein TELEPHONE la 1E)7370400 m ailman We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or sho

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

.S.C. §2422(b) could or should be brought against Jeffrey Epstein, even assuming the specific conduct that

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's ease.' Enclosed is data that strongly supports

ty by minors on his PDA to prove his intent. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Meek, 366 F.3d 705 (9ih Cir. 2004) Internet Internet chat room contact of 14 yr-old male; had sex with 14 yr-old & posted naked photos of boy on the Internet; police took

ivision The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 41' Street Miami, Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i P) 9/313-SI92 We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C.

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the

Florida 33132 Dear Mr. Menchel: July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein TELEPHONE '212)737-0400 FACSIMILE 12i

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case.t Enclosed is data that strongly supports

formation. 210 month sentence affirmed. 2422(b); 2251(a) & (d); 2256; 2252(aX5)(B) No Information U.S. I Grenman, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 841093 (9ih Cir. 2007) Not for Publication No Information No information available. Appeal of sentence. Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded. 2422(

RENA FAITH BY HAND of of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern Distri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have previously provided you with a memo as to why we believe no charge under 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) could or should b

ting this statute. We also posited that the language of the statute would have to be stretched beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports the arguments we previously made. We have thoroughly analyzed every prosecution brought under the s

istri of Florida tams, on a 3132 July 25, 2007 Jeffrey Epstein •ELE.T., FACSIMILE Dear Mr. We have pr

beyond recognition to fit the particular facts of Mr. Epstein's case! Enclosed is data that strongly supports

entrapment. Conviction affirmed. - 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Kozlowski, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9489 (9ih Cir. 2007) Unpublished No Information No information available. Anders Brief appeal of sentence of 60 months; denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Informa