Epstein Secrets

due by 5/29/2009), MOTION to identify jane doe #102 in the third-party subpoenas for purposes of discovery, with incorporated memorandum of law by Jeffrey Epstein.(see docket entry 5 for image) (tas) (Entered: 05/12/2009) https://eef.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.p17825839498761356-L_801 0-1 6/10/2009 EFTA001

09-80656-CIV-Ryskamp JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE #102 IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOS

erve so Epstein can defend this case. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows: EFTA00175214 • Case 9:09-c

10/03/2008 4 r 82.8 KB ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to 2 Summons Issued, 1 Complaint Acknowledgement filed by Jane Doe No. 7. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/03/2008) 10/03/2008 5 fi 26.1 Ica NOTICE of Striking 4 Acknowledgment of Service filed by Jane Doe No. 7 by Jane Doe No. 7 (Her

175301 CM/Eg - Live Database - flsd Page 4 of 7 05/20/2009 18 n NOTICE by of Filing Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Defendant, Jeey Epstein's Motion to Compel And/Or Identify in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify . in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, Or, Altern

7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO

ims with no connection to federal law. Economy also weighs in favor of remand as state courts are better equipped to efficiently handle state 2 In United Mine Workers v. Gibbs 383 U.S. 715 (1966), a jury's verdict against a union based on State law claims was reversed, in part, because the federal law claim fail

by James Peterson of Peterson Properties Real Estate Services Inc. Cap II leases properties to companies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns a ranch near Stanley, supported Richardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epstein heads J. Epstein & C

's house to provide massages. further stated she had been to the house approximately 4 or 5 times in the past year. Each time any girl was taken to Epsteins house, they were previously told they would have to provide a massage, possibly naked. It was also told that should Epstein require them to do anyth

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, w

hardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epstein heads J. Epstein & Co., a Manhattan money-management company. He

led upstairs to the main bedroom known to her as Jeff Epstein's bedroom . Sarah arranged the massage table and

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, wh

e, Ill. Health care • $5,000 Homeland Security Corporation, Nashville, Tenn. Security • $5,000 KBHome, Los Angeles, Calif. Real estate • $5,000 United Mine Workers of America, Price, Utah Labor committee • $5,000 E. W. Williams Jr., Amarillo, Texas Banker http://abqtrib.com/archives/news02/120702_news_donat

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, wh

Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns a ranch near Stanley, supported Richardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epste n heads Epstein & Co., a Manhattan money-management company. He built a mansion on the 100,000-acre Zorro Ranch he bought from former Gov. Bruce

by James Peterson of Peterson Properties Real Estate Services Inc. Cap II leases properties to companies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns a ranch near Stanley, supported Richardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epste n heads Epstein & Co.

ch as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, w

e, Ill. Health care • $5,000 Homeland Security Corporation, Nashville, Tenn. Security • $5,000 KBHome, Los Angeles, Calif. Real estate • $5,000 United Mine Workers of America, Price, Utah Labor committee • $5,000 E. W. Williams Jr., Amarillo, Texas Banker 09/12/2019 Page 2260 Agency to Agency Reguet: 19-0

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, w

ompanies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, wh

by James Peterson of Peterson Properties Real Estate Services Inc. Cap II leases properties to companies such as Walgreens Drug Stores Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns a ranch near Stanley, supported Richardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epstein heads J. Epstein & C

Inc. 10. Jeffrey E. Epstein: $50,000 The New York City financier, who owns a ranch near Stanley, supported Richardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epstein heads J. Epstein & Co., a Manhattan money-management company. He built a mansion on the 100,000-acre Zorro Ranch he bought from former Gov. Bruce

hardson's campaign in New Mexico. Epstein heads J. Epstein & Co., a Manhattan money-management company. He

e, Ill. Health care • $5,000 Homeland Security Corporation, Nashville, Tenn. Security • $5,000 KBHome, Los Angeles, Calif. Real estate • $5,000 United Mine Workers of America, Price, Utah Labor committee • $5,000 E. W. Williams Jr., Amarillo, Texas Banker http://abqtrib.com/archives/news02/120702_news_donat

cument 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/12/2009 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EP

IN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, through counsel, opposes Defendant's RICHARD EPSTEIN's Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's argument for a di

FF'S AMENDED' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, thro

ISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and Defendants. ) CASE NO.: 09-80469

, stating: "The Court declines to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the state law claims and remands the action to state court. The Court finds In United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966), a jury's verdict against a union based on State law claims was reversed, in part, because the federal law claim fai