Epstein Secrets

econd amended complaint (the "Fisher counterclaim"), is granted in all respects. The Soffer ejectment motion is granted as against deft Ron Soffer. Defls Jeffrey E. Epstein, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Dianeataga?/a The Fisher Group, Fisher & Soffer a/k/a Fisher & Sophir, D. Gerzog, Robert Heilbum,

the house to the tenant we have selected should Mr. Epstein decide not to reoccupy the premises under the ne

on of the budding pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. § 4301 of seq. 0FM leased the building to defen- dant Jeffrey E. Epstein in 1992. Epstein sublet the building to defendant Ivan S. Fish- er in 1996, purportedly without the Govern- ment's consent. Fisher, in turn, sublet a portion of the

n personally liable because Epstein did not sign the con- tract as an agent or as a corporate officer. Epstein signed the contract as follows: /s/ Jeffery Epstein 1AG. Under New York law, a signature in a representative capacity would have been "Jeffrey Epstein for I.A.G." or "I.A.G., by Jeffrey Epstein". 2

atters extrinsic to the complaint. we will treat defendant Epstein's motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judg

RDERED. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, I Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elis

RDERED. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, I Jeffrey E. EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elise

fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation. Finally, I will grant the defendants' motion to dis- miss Counts I, II, III, and VI for failure to meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)'s heightened pleading requirement for fraud, but I will grant leave for the plain- tiffs to amend their pleadings. I. FACTUAL AND

6100 RED HOOK QTRS ST THOMAS, VI 00802-1348 4. J EPSTEIN & CO INC ST THOMAS. VI 5. MOF VI LIMITED PARTN

ND INDUSTRY SIC CODES: 6282 - Investment advisory service LOAD-DATE: May 18, 2013 LEGAL RESULTS: Court Cases: FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. AND JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIGROUP, INC. d/b/a "CITIGROUP," Defendants. Civ. No. 2002-108 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT

Debtor 2 Name: FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY. INC. C/O J. EPSTEIN & COMPANY, INC Address: 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK

Court Cases: FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. AND JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITI

Court Cases: FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. AND JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. AND CITIG

)(6) for the breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation claims, and counts I, II, III and VI of the first amended complaint failed to meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)'s heightened pleading standard. I did, however, grant the plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. Financial Trust Co. v. Citibank,

Todd Steven To: Paul Morris Subject: JE follow-up - past litigation with Citi. [SC] Classification: Strictly Confidential Paul — were you aware JE sued Citi7 You mentioned today you assessed the likelihood of JE being a litigious client negligible, so would like to get more clarity on the lawsu

it below. Many thanks, Daniel FINANCIAL TRUST CO., INC. v. CITIBANK N.A. ryo 0W2002-108 268 F Supp 2d 561 (2003) FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. and Jeffrey E. Epstein, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc. d/b/a "Citigroup," Defendants. District Court, Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas and St 'kiln. June

will grant leave for the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In their amended complaint, Jeffrey E. Epstein ["Epstein") and Financial Trust Company, Inc. ("FTC") [collectively "plaintiffs") allege that Citibank, N.A. ('Citibank") and Citigroup, Inc. ("Ciligroup, [co

2d 561 (2003) FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. and Jeffrey E. Epstein, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. and Citig

2d 561 (2003) FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. and Jeffrey E. Epstein, Plaintiffs, v. CITIBANK, N.A. and Citigr

of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation. Finally, I will grant the defendants' motion to dismiss Counts I, II, Ill, and VI for failure to meet Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)'s heightened pleading requirement for fraud, but I will grant leave for the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings. I. FACTUAL AND PROC