3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
9 / 3
Mentions
ADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which counsel presented argument on the Motion. On Dec
iff/Counter-Defendant Jeffery Epstein's lawsuit against Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards then countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his initial suit. On August 25, 2011, Epstein served an Offer of Judgment ("Offer") on Edwa
L CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB CIVIL DIV
judgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its own attorney's fees. Alamo Fin., L.P. v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). "The rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement proposa
J. EDWARDS, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which counsel presented argument on the Motion. On Dec
iff/Counter-Defendant Jeffery Epstein's lawsuit against Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Scott Rothstein. Edwards then countersued Epstein for malicious prosecution. Epstein voluntarily dismissed his initial suit. On August 25, 2011, Epstein served an Offer of Judgment ("Offer") on Edwa
L CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA040800XXXXMB CIVIL DIV
judgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its own attorney's fees. Alamo Fin.. L.P. v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). "The rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement propos
L CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, CASE NO.: 2009CA0408003OOOCMB CIVIL DI
APPENDIX 1. Order Granting Fees and Costs of February 3, 2015 2. Epstein's Motion for Fees and Costs with attached pleadings dated June 2, 2014. EFTA00617978 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN A
ADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which 't counsel presented argument on the Motion. On
udgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party pay its oven attorney's fees. Alamo Fin., v. Mazoff, 112 So. 3d 626, 628 (FM. 4th DCA 2013). "The, rule does not demand the impossible. It merely requires that the settlement proposal be
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Alamo Fin

Bradley Edwards
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONTonja Haddad Coleman
PERSONChambers
PERSONFred Haddad
PERSONBurlington & Rockenbach
ORGANIZATIONMarc Nurik
PERSON
Nichols
PERSONFlorida Rule of Civil
ORGANIZATION
William B. King
PERSONBowman
PERSONthe General Release
ORGANIZATIONFarm Mut
PERSONMazoff
PERSONZiadie
PERSONthe Court on Counter-Defendant's
ORGANIZATIONthe Offer of Judgment
ORGANIZATIONFeldbaum
ORGANIZATION