Epstein Secrets

or Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statu

24 25 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS Page Line 61 22 123 20 146 14 148 1 153 5 159 13 162 3 EFTA01695652 3 1 The videotaped deposition of JEFFREY 2 EPSTEIN in the above-entitled and numbered cause, 3 was taken before me, S a Registered 4 Professional Reporter and Notary Public for the 5 State of F

ive us your name. 9 A Jeffrey Epstein. 10 Q Mr. Epstein, you made a comment when you 11 came in the roo

to noon, with a majority of the days indicating between 9am and 10am. COUNT #2 On August 27, 2009, a FAA Certified Pilot who is in the employ of Jeffrey i E tein *th Jeffrey Epstein, and Jeffrey Epstein's at the West Palm Beach Airport. During a deposition of m ss on October 15, 2009, he testifie

Fourteenth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. The Court Reporter noted that she was just an eye witness to deponent Jeffrey Epst ' tting blatant perjury. She herself heard him say at least three times that he liked t By answering those questions in the manner he did and under o

like to answer all your Questions here as I've... tried to do my best, however, my attorneys have advised me that I must assert my Sixth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. The Court Reporter noted that she was just an eye witness to deponent Jeffrey Epst ' ttin

24 25 CERTIFIED QUESTIONS Page Line 61 22 123 20 146 14 148 1 153 5 159 13 162 3 EFTA01723953 3 1 The videotaped deposition of JEFFREY 2 EPSTEIN in the above-entitled and numbered cause, 3 was taken before me, a Registered 4 Professional Reporter and Notary Public for the 5 State of Flo

ed: Dated: RALD LEFCO RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFF Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

il matter where he is a defendant. Prior to the onset of the de osition, Epstein was seated in an office along with Attorney's and Court Reporter Jeffrey E stei en e attorney's in an unsolicited conversation w e stated "I like our other two, I don't like them, but I like and I would like to 's

ive us your name. 9 A Jeffrey Epstein. 10 Q Mr. Epstein, you made a comment when you 11 came in the roo

n to him when or ow they returned to a eac . e ey Epstein, left the county, via air transportation in viol

like to answer all your Questions here as I've... tried to do my best, however, my attorneys have advised me that I must assert my Sixth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment and Fifth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. The Court Reporter noted that she was just an eye witness to deponent Jeffrey Epstein comm

nt's failure to identify any documents among the 13,468 pages that it is withholding that concern AUSA Bruce Reinhart's internal knowledge about the Epstein prosecution before he left the U.S. Attorney's Office and became employed by Epstein. DE 226 at 8-9. The victims pointed out that the Government ha

New York Telephone Email: Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: Email: Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 9 EFTA00616108

Telephone: Email: Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein /s/ Bradley J. Edwards 9 EFTA00616108

7 of 9 Government claims that the victims do not have a "liberty" or "property" interest sufficient to trigger a due process claim, citing various Fourteenth Amendment cases. DE 230 at 8-9. But, once again, the Government evades the issue. The victims indisputably have a statutory right under the CVRA to be "treat

S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1 , 18 L. Ed.2d 865 (1967); Buchanan Rhodes. 885 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 83, 17 .Ed.2d 9 (1966); Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed2d 794 (1962). Since in this case we affirm that refusal, we need not now decide whether or not there is juri

, Gary A. Hughes, J.D, Steven D. Najarian, J.D., Jeffrey A. Schafer, J.D., and Jeffrey J. Shampo, J.D. II

nistrative board to grant or withhold permission to carry on trade or business properly subject to regulation under police power does not violate Fourteenth Amendment. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 14. t Courts 4=280.2 Federal courts have only that ju- risdiction which Congress, acting within the limits of the Constitu