Epstein Secrets

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste

ON TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, p

e objection, same instruction. Id. at page 235; line 20-21. Q: At the meetings that you, at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that, discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein was tat ever disc

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste

ON TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, p

e objection, same instruction. Id. at page 235; line 20-21. Q: At the meetings that you, at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Buschel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery that, discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein was tat ever disc

rivilege is very clearly defined in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3). And, Your Honor, that is quoted in the response in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion to overrule objections and compel answers to these questions. It is quoted in its entirety at page two of our response. And it says that a

urt is aware, the only thing pending at this point in time in the case is Mr. Edwards' claim of abuse of process malicious prosecution against Mr. Epstein. The abuse of process claim has been disposed of. It was successfully won on the summary judgment and is no longer an issue. So the only operativ

H COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

f abuse of process malicious prosecution against Mr. Epstein. The abuse of process claim has been disposed o

Mr. Epstein?" "Same objection. Same instruction." Question: "At the meetings that you at the meetings that occurred where these various lawyers, Berger, Adler, Stone, Rob Bushel were present and Epstein was discussed, was the discovery and/or investigation regarding Mr. Epstein ever discussed?" "Objection."