Epstein Secrets

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste

ON TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, p

ctions have sanctioned counsel for just this behavior during deposition. See e.g. Van Pilsum v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, 152 F.R.D. 179 (S.D. Iowa 1993) ("The style adopted by [deponent's counsel]...will not be tolerated by this court. Merely because depositions do not take place in

HE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epste

ON TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS TO ANSWER OUESTIONS Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.380(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby moves this Court for entry

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

you put into Q-task regarding the claims against Mr. Epstein? Transcript of Deposition dated March 23, 2010, p

ctions have sanctioned counsel for just this behavior during deposition. See e.g. Van Pilsum v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology, 152 F.R.D. 179 (S.D. Iowa 1993) ("The style adopted by [deponent's counsel]...will not be tolerated by this court. Merely because depositions do not take place in

PEL NON-PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN. P.C. E

o v. Stanley Black & Decker Inc., No. CV 13-3963 JFB SIL, 2015 WL 136011, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2015) (citing Baki v. B.F. Diamond Constr. Co., 71 F.R.D. 179, 181-82 (D.Md. 1976)); Eisai Co. v. Teva Phann. USA, Inc., 247 F.R.D. 440, 441-42 (D.N.J. 2007). Ms. Maxwell has not sought discovery of "facts kno