Epstein Secrets

40800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, et al., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWARDS'S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION F

DERATION OF ORAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING, REOUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.510 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this Renewed Motion for

of March 23, 2010; dockets and pleadings in LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008C44028051)OOCXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058DOCAMB AB; LM v. Jay Epstein, 09-81092 Marra/Johnson and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson; copies of subpoenas; Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein,

e of these potentially explosive facts, putative defendant Epstein had allegedly offered $200,000,000.00 for settlem

CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY JEFFREY EPSTEIN, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG Plaintif

(the "Epstein Cases"). See pleadings in LM v. Jee•ey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein,

ed by Scott Rothstein, who was disbarred before he was 4 While the Ponzi Scheme was ongoing, RRA was prosecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). See pleadings in LM v. Jee•ey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein,

s and participants who worked on the "Epstein Cases" while they were being prosecuted by RRA; denial of access to discovery and other information to Epstein during this lawsuit. 8 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7°' Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00799372 42. John Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Sca

leadings and activity in the "Epstein Cases" while at RRA; denial of access to discovery and other information to Epstein during this lawsuit. 43. Jeffrey Epstein do Tonja Haddad, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Depending on the testimony of witnesses and evidence presented by

information to Epstein during this lawsuit. 43. Jeffrey Epstein do Tonja Haddad, PA 315 SE 7th Street

Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 He is expected to testify regarding the Ponzi scheme, use of the "Epstein Cases" in the furtherance thereof. 2. Ken Jenne do Broward County Sheriff's Office 2601 W. Broward Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312-1308 He is expecte

s. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff, JUDGE: DAVID CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEDIATION SUMMARY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Mediation Su

nter-Plaintiff, JUDGE: DAVID CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEDIATION SUMMARY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Mediation Summary in preparation for the Mediation scheduled before you on October 11,

UNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408003OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOT

gest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history. Also during that time RRA, through its partner, Edwards, was prosecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). After RRA imploded in early November 2009, Epstein learned, along with the rest of South Florida, about the Ponzi scheme, and that it was the Ep

40800XXXXMBAG Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JUDGE HAFELE v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, et al., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY EDWAFtDS'S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM, REOUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND SUPPORTIN

EDWAFtDS'S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM, REOUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 1.510 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby files this Motion for Summary

s Rights Act: When asked whether Epstein "pulled you closer to him in a sexual way," [LM] replied: A. I wish. No, no, never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. At the end of her interview, [LM] was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Villafana. [LM] responded: A. N

other dignitaries associated with him.5 [Cite Epstein 4 While the Ponzi Scheme was ongoing, RRA was prosecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). See pleadings in LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein

s. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff, JUDGE: DAVID CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEDIATION SUMMARY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Mediation Su

nter-Plaintiff, JUDGE: DAVID CROW PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEDIATION SUMMARY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Mediation Summary in preparation for the Mediation scheduled before you on October 11,

OUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. SCOT

gest Ponzi scheme in Florida's history. Also during that time RRA, through its partner, Edwards, was prosecuting three civil cases against Epstein (the "Epstein Cases"). After RRA imploded in early November 2009, Epstein learned, along with the rest of South Florida, about the Ponzi scheme, and that it was the Ep