Epstein Secrets

omise 42 B. Jeepers Has No Claim for Fraud Because Mr. Zwirn Fully Disclosed All Accounting Irregularities and Made No Misrepresentations to Mr. Epstein 43 C. Jeepers's Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty or Negligent Misrepresentation Against Mr. Zwirn and the Other Zwirn Parties 47 III. JEEPER

in June 2009, VRF I LLC became the managing member of the Fund. The dispute centers on whether or not Jeepers, an investment vehicle controlled by Jeffrey Epstein, complied with the rules of the Fund when it attempted to withdraw money from the Fund. Claimants have no direct financial interest in this dispute

not Jeepers, an investment vehicle controlled by Jeffrey Epstein, complied with the rules of the Fund whe

Irregularities and Made No Misrepresentations to Mr. Epstein 43 C. Jeepers's Claim for Breach of Fiduciary

requires "enforce[ment of] the objectively reasonable interpretation that emerges." United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Holdings, Inc., 937 A.2d 810, 835 (Del. Ch. 2007). As we now discuss, if the Arbitrator examines the LPA from the perspective of a third person with any knowledge of hedge funds, the practic

(Del. Ch. 1992) 48, 49 AT&T Corp. v. Lillis, 953 A.2d 241 (Del. 2008) 30 BASF Corp. v. POSM H Props. P'ship, LP, 09 Civ. 3608, 2009 WL 522721 (Del. Ch. March 3, 2009) 36 Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd., 822 A.2d 1024 (Del. 2003) 42 Citadel Holding Corp. v. Roven, 603 A.2d 818 (Del. 1

eepers, Inc., Respondent ALAN W. KORNSERG DANIEL J. KRAMER 2AVID K. LAKTIONIR TIOTHIN P LAMB* MOON . Lang; DANIEL4 kgr•ELL XIAO'YLI R • LIU JEFFREY MARELL MARCO MASOTTI EDWIN S. MAYNARD DAVID W. MAYO ELIZABETH R. MCCOLM MARK I F. MENDELSOHN • SY S. MYERSON J MN E NATHAN NE NYARADY

L L REISNER WALTER G. RICCIARIM WALTER RIEMAN RICHARD A. ROI1N ANDREW N ITO NIIRG J ROTHEN•ERG JACQUELINE P RAPHAEL M RUSSO JE CCCCC D. SA EPSTEIN JEFFREY SARROSAMUELS rt KENNETH MNIMITAEIDER ROBERT •. SCHUMER JAMES H. SCHWAB ./Q14N M. SCOTT STEPHEN J. IMSHAK DAVID . MOSES •ILVERMAN

G J ROTHEN•ERG JACQUELINE P RAPHAEL M RUSSO JE CCCCC D. SA EPSTEIN JEFFREY SARROSAMUELS rt KE

amounts as the General Partner shall determine." Mr. Epstein concedes he did not read the LPA prior to investi

1997). A court determines whether an interpretation is "reasonable" from the perspective of a third party. Dittrick v. Chalfant, 948 A.2d 400, 406 (Del. Ch. 2007) ("[If] a reasonable third party would be unable to determine the meaning of certain contractual provisions, the agreement is considered ambi

kground 2 I. DBZ's Investment Strategy 3 2. Mr. Zwirn's Role at DBZ 3 3. Mr. Dubin's Involvement with DBZ 4 4. DBZ's Lock-Ups 4 C. Mr. Epstein's Relationship with Mr. Dubin 6 D. FTC's Investments in the Fund 7 E. Accounting Improprieties at DBZ 8 F. DBZ's Discovery of Accounting Imp

Third-Party Claimants Financial Trust Company, Inc. and Jeepers, Inc. (together, "FTC"). Preliminary Statement At no time did Daniel Zwim promise Jeffrey Epstein that FTC could immediately withdraw $80 million of its investments in DBZ's Fund. Mr. Epstein's claim that Mr. Zwim made such a promise is a newly

ary Statement At no time did Daniel Zwim promise Jeffrey Epstein that FTC could immediately withdraw $80

volvement with DBZ 4 4. DBZ's Lock-Ups 4 C. Mr. Epstein's Relationship with Mr. Dubin 6 D. FTC's Inves

Conclusion 31 EFTA00613905 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES A.R. DeMarco Enters., Inc. v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., Page(s) 2002 WL 31820970 (Del. Ch. Nov. 26, 2002) 29 Anglo Amen Sec. Fund, L.P. v. S.R. Global Int'! Fund, L.P., 2006 WL 1494360 (Del. Ch. May 24, 2006) 20 BAE Sys. N. Am. Inc. v