Epstein Secrets

cle that forms the subject of our client's complaint is the one published on MailOnline on 18 December 2018 headed "Second woman claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein 'directed' her to hove sex with lawyer Alan Dershowitz WHILE he was defending pedophile on underage prostitution charge" (url: , y II I CO I 65097

below the legal age of consent) and who had been directed to have sex with him by his paedophile client, Jeffrey Epstein, while he was defending Mr Epstein on — and dishonestly submitting to the Court that Mr Epstein was innocent of — underage prostitution charges. It perhaps goes without saying that t

rts have alleged otherwise, each is lying, and demonstrably so. (3) He has never knowingly or dishonestly misled a Court, whether in the context of Mr Epstein's case or on any other occasion. No tenable defence In the light of the above, any suggested defence of truth would be misconceived, bound to fail a

ber 2018 headed "Second woman claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein 'directed' her to hove sex with lawyer Al

nce of the offences with which he was charged. Serious harm to reputation It perhaps also goes without saying. applying the principles laid down by the Court of Appeal in Lochaux v Independent Print Ltd [2018] QB 594, that the publication of this article has 51241084.3 2 EFTA00793972 Macon de Reya caused — an

rica (hereafter "USA"), where Ms Ghislaine Maxwell is being detained pre-trial on charges relating to her alleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 1997. • Olivier Laude has instructed me to draft an opinion regarding the French extradition procedure and t

lleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 1997. • O

to her alleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 199

or incarceration at the remand prison of the Court of appeal in which jurisdiction he/she has been apprehended. The decision of the President of the Court of Appeal can be challenged before the Investigating Chamber of the Court of Appeal. In case of incarceration, the requested person can file an application f

rica (hereafter "USA"), where Ms Ghislaine Maxwell is being detained pre-trial on charges relating to her alleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 1997. • Olivier Laude has instructed me to draft an opinion regarding the French extradition procedure and t

lleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 1997. • O

to her alleged role in sexual activities between Jeffrey Epstein and certain minor girls, from 1994 to 199

or incarceration at the remand prison of the Court of appeal in which jurisdiction he/she has been apprehended. The decision of the President of the Court of Appeal can be challenged before the Investigating Chamber of the Court of Appeal. In case of incarceration, the requested person can file an application f