Epstein Secrets

132 Dear Alex: AND Anmann rosTmiunos Coagroup Cellar 159 East WO 94teot Now York, Slow Van 10022.4611 www.kirkioncl.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

2.4611 www.kirkioncl.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See aro, John Doe 1 v. Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action

33132 Dear Alex: AND AntiAnn rioninains Cola/cup Cara/ 159 East San Snot New York, Now Van 10022.4611 www.kirkiond.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

22.4611 www.kirkiond.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See aro, John Doe 1 v. Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action

132 Dear Alex: AND Anmann riormiuroos Calgroup Cantor 159 East Said S0441 New York, Now Van 10022.4611 www.kirldend.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you posed to me during a conversation we had late last week. Specifically, you requested a clarification of our po

's alleged conduct.' in addition, under the Attorney General Guidelines, notification roust be balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Guidelines clearly call into question the wisdom and practicality of giving notice" to a "possible u i

22.4611 www.kirldend.00m December 26, 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epstein I write to address the questions you pos

balanced against a iy action that may impinge on Mr. Epstein's due process rights. The Attorney Crinieral Gui

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See also, John Doe II Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action