Epstein Secrets

From: Joscha Bach To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:33:27 +0000 What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning?

s space/field effects? The universe or learning? Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel lachine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think of it more of a space / field effects , Not recursive algorithm s > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 6:06 AM Jos

From: Joscha Bach To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Fri,

From: Joscha Bach To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Da

r 2018 16:33:27 +0000 What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning? Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel lachine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think of it more of a space / field effects , Not recursiv

Sent Fri 9/10/2010 11:25:05 PM lieber martin ; Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] a sentence was truncated

i 9/10/2010 11:25:05 PM lieber martin ; Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] a sentence was truncated

Sent Fri 9/10/2010 11:25:05 PM lieber martin ; Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] a sentence was tr

matical results--that a trivial extension of theory deeply deforms the underlying structure of the logic--this to me would be more astonishing than Goedel's proof and if i could understand it would be the first to congratulate you. EFTA_R1_01487776 EFTA02421479

From: Joscha Bach < Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 10:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin A. Nowak Subject: "Something big" vs "The end of science" Newton, Kant, Darwin etc. built new, essentially complete systems, =hrough which

Sunday, December 11, 2016 10:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin A. Nowak Subject: "Something big" vs "T

Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2016 10:58 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein; Martin A. Nowak Subject: "Something bi

ic approaches have been found, especially computation and =ybernetics. But physics fizzled: Einstein's and Maxwell's universes =ould not be unified. Goedel ruined the party in mathematics. =ybernetics got lost in complexity theory. Minsky's Al and Chomsky's =inguistics seemed to have failed. And at the

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Thursday, January 2, 2014 5:57 PM Re: signature.asc Thanks Jeffrey. Jeffrey was talking about you in the context of Bounded =ationality which relates to an ongoing conversation I've been having =ith him. I was diggi

ion for today. I hope that you are doing > well and look forward to having lunch again one of these days. > Yours, Seth On Jan 3, 2014, at 02:50, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> =rote: > seth ,joi, i think you two will like each other > > The information contained in this communication is confidenti

> Yours, Seth On Jan 3, 2014, at 02:50, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> =rote: > seth ,joi, i th

an make of oneself is > oneself itself. • This self-referential conclusion is the basis for a number of famous > mathematical theorems, including Goedel's incompleteness theorem and > the halting problem. But its primary expression in everyday life is > the undecidability of decisions before they ar

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 5:09 PM To: Joscha Bach Subject: Re: understanding is a multi dimensional space the langua

=Joscha Bach > wrote: What do you think of as space/field effects? The univ=rse or earning. Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel Machine?<=r> > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com» wrote: > I would think of it more of a sp